Talk:2019 Abruzzo regional election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Results[edit]

10 February 2019 Abruzzo regional election results
Candidates		Votes	%	Seats	Parties		Votes	%	Seats

	Marco Marsilio					League
						Forza Italia
						Brothers of Italy
						Union of the Centre–IdeA–DC
						Political Action
					Total		'	'	'
	Sara Marcozzi					Five Star Movement
	Giovanni Legnini					Democratic Party
						Legnini for President
						Progressives with Legnini–Abruzzo Left–LeU
						Abruzzo Together–Abruzzo Future
						More Abruzzo–Democratic Centre
						Forward Abruzzo–Italy of Values
						Solidarity and Populars for Legnini–Centrists for Europe
						Abruzzo in Common
					Total		'	'	'
	Stefano Flajani					CasaPound Italy

Total candidates		–	100.00	2	Total parties		–	100.00	29
Source:

order after SWG Braganza (talk) 11:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling table[edit]

Ritchie92 I do not want to start an edit war, so I would like to discuss with you the opinion polling table.I believe that the inclusion of results would seem unnecessary, as the results can always be found in the results table and the infobox. However, that not my main point, as although I disagree with the inclusion it does not really matter that much, there are two main problems with the results row: The use of the header cell is rather weird. The inclusion of results within most opinion polling articles, e.g. the 2017 German federal election, the 2017 United Kingdom general election and etc, will always use the standard cell, along with a shade of grey to distinguish the results from the polls. The second problem is the use of the meta color for the highlighting of the winning candidate; this looks strange due to the fact that it does not distinguish between the "colour bar" for the candidate and the result and the colour is very striking on its own. My suggestion is to revert back to my edit. JDuggan101 ^{talk. | Cont.} 10:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would remove it altogether, because it's not an opinion poll. If you want to keep it, one of the two examples that you mentioned are ok for me (personally prefer Opinion polling for the 2017 United Kingdom general election). Cheers! --Ritchie92 (talk) 10:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]