Talk:2023 Fairleigh Dickinson vs. Purdue men's basketball game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by BullDawg2021 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/2023 Fairleigh Dickinson vs. Purdue men's basketball game; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: @BullDawg2021: So i've noticed that from a first viewing there looks to be quite a lot uncited. For example

  • At the start of this game, NCAA tournament No. 16 seeds were 1–150 all-time against No. 1 seeds since the tournament field expanded to 64 teams in 1985. Five years prior to this game, the UMBC Retrievers became the first No. 16 seed to defeat a No. 1 seed, 74–54, over the Virginia Cavaliers.
  • The team completed the regular season with a 19–15 record and a second-place finish in the NEC.
  • the entire broadcast section
  • the entire game summary section
  • additionally, the Boilermakers had been eliminated in the first round of the 2021 tournament by 13-seed North Texas. Fairleigh Dickinson advanced to the Round of 32, in which they faced the 9-seed Florida Atlantic Owls on March 19, 2023. The game was competitive throughout the majority of the game, and the Knights led throughout the first ten minutes of the second half. However, the Owls won the game 78–70, thus ending FDU's two-game Cinderella run.

These are going to need to be fixed before I approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have added references to those parts of the article, if you would please review again! Thanks! @Onegreatjoke:

@BullDawg2021: Just need a citation for "The game drew 4.37 million viewers." at the reception section and we're good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: Ok, I added a citation at that spot, so hopefully it is ready to go now.

BullDawg2021 (talk)

Looks fine now. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BullDawg2021: Consider moving the external links MOS:ORDER Bruxton (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox ranking width[edit]

The width of the AP and Coaches rankings for FDU are way thinner than for Purdue, to the point where the "Coaches: NR" breaks onto a separate line. Can somebody who knows how to work infoboxes fix this? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 22:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked someone at the template talk page to look into it. FWIW, the mobile version of the page has equal width columns. Hoof Hearted (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]