Talk:32nd Regiment Royal Artillery

Military history: South Pacific / Balkan / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force

Disbandment[edit]

This statement contained within Strategic Defence and Security Review - Army:Written statement - HCWS367 might not use the exact word "disbandment" but....

HQ 102 Logistic Brigade, 32nd Regiment Royal Artillery, 35 Engineer Regiment, Headquarters 64 Works Group Royal Engineers, 2 Medical Regiment, Headquarters 4th Regiment Royal Military Police, 33 Field Hospital and 104,105 and 106 Battalions of the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers reserve will be rationalised, with all manpower in those units being redeployed to other areas of the Army in its refined structure

...I'd say that "disbandment" is exactly what it means, and therefore the word "disbanded" is acceptable shorthand for it. Exemplo347 (talk) 11:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If "all manpower in those units [are] being redeployed" then I would agree that this is disbandment. Dormskirk (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So picky.JessPavarocks (talk) 11:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is definitely being disbanded. First hand experience of being told exactly that by the Commanding Officer. Stingray Trainer (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use old sources[edit]

74 Battery (The Battle Axe Company) Royal Artillery has it's own page saying it is part of 47th Regiment RA so stop posting old links as sources. Just because that presentation slide contains the name 32 RA doesn't mean it is up to date. The CO has changed in any case. BlueD954 (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]