Talk:Action of 9 November 1822/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 02:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. Buccaneer is slightly different from pirate can I suggest you stay with pirate
2. despite the lack of wind, using its sweeps - are sweeps oars clarification required for us non nautical types

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

1. 1. I believe i have fixed both these issues.XavierGreen (talk) 07:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

• Passed GA a tidy little article. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:28, 23 September 2010 (UTC)