This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool based on the length of the article. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Percussion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of percussion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PercussionWikipedia:WikiProject PercussionTemplate:WikiProject PercussionPercussion articles
I'm blowed if I can see the need for inlne citations in a potted biography of this length. The original authors referenced two potted biographies in reliable secondary sources, quoting both ISBNs, which should be enough verifiability surely as the material is hardly controversial.
But somebody has a problem with it. Fortunately, I have just stumbled on a third such reference. It seems to be much the same as the other two, and I've inlined the more important bits of what it specifically verifies, as that's what inlines are for. Hopefully this will satisfy. All three references are readily available in dead-tree format for those still suspicious, just follow the ISBN links, and short of copyvio by quoting the whole section verbatim I can't see what else is possible. Or necessary. Andrewa (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
