Talk:Alpha Motor Corporation

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Neuron Corporation[edit]

Hi folks, I'm not seeing any source that now claims Alpha and Neuron have the relationship stated in the text. I'd say we have good evidence there is a strong relationship, based on the source. But the claimed relationship, as a successor Neuron, isn't in the source cited (at least not any more). Hobit (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The word "successor" may not be ideal. If the cited source is correct then the one company was set up by the same people, or some of the same people, who had been responsible for the other company, in order to carry on similar business after the original company was no longer operating, and that relationship can reasonably be described as being a "successor" company, but on the other hand the word could be interpreted as implying a legal connection as a continuation of the same business, which probably is not the case. Therefore, it would probably be a good idea for someone to substitute an alternative form of wording which conveys essentially the same information in a less ambiguous form. I don't see that as a substantial problem. JBW (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To make my position on this clear, (in all due respect) I couldn't give a rats about the content dispute, hence I'll keep out of that. On the other hand I do give a rats about blatant COI editing, corporate whitewashing, sockpuppetry and block evasion. Honestly, if Alpha motors corporation wants to improve their corporate image, they could start by avoiding this sort of carry-on. Mako001 (talk) 02:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal[edit]

Given this company has not in fact made one single commercially available car is it not a bit early to have an article on it?Slatersteven (talk) 18:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven: The company exists and there's WP:SIGCOV. All info about future plans are sourced, too. If the company turns to be a fraud or files for bankruptcy then the article can be slightly changed to state that. ~~Waddles~~ Gobbles 🍂 🦃 20:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2022[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

I like to add the logo file Alpha_Motor_Corporation_Logo.jpg for alpha motor corporation Zackyboyman (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Please make your request for a new image to be uploaded to Files For Upload. Once the file has been properly uploaded, feel free to reactivate this request to have the new image used. - PianoDan (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackyboyman: I've added the logo for you. Waddles 🗩 🖉 06:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]