Talk:Amedy Coulibaly

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as High-importance).

Separate Hayat Boumeddiene article?

I suggest creating a separate article. I think she meets the standard of noteworthy apart from her role in Coulibaly's attack, and the existing article contains enough text to create a separate article. Plus, Coulibaly's story, at least as we can observe it here in the mortal realm, is over, while Boumeddiene's bio may continue to evolve. Rudeboy1977 (talk) 15:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 21:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amedy Coulibaly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal of March 2020

Bijdenhandje applied a {{mergeto}} here, and applied a {{mergefrom}} to January 2015 Île-de-France attacks.

I think those who initiate a merge process are obliged to leave an explanation on the talk page. But Bijdenhandje did not do so. Their only explanation was the edit summary "obvious". I invited them to read a user essary I wrote - User:Geo Swan/nothing is obvious.

This merge suggestion not only does not strike me as obvious, it seems to be a terrible idea, possibly due to a lack of appreciation of how wikilinks work. The two articles are about two distinct topics. They are related, but there is information in each that does not belong in the other. Geo Swan (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing stale merge proposal; uncontested objection and no support; no case made. Klbrain (talk) 08:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved