Talk:Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India: West Bengal Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Popular culture reference[edit]

A note on a popular culture reference:

While I did not think this appropriate for the main article, there is a major subplot surrounding Dr. Chakrabarty's work in the Dean Koontz' novel Phantoms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavdana (talk • contribs) 19:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty → Ananda Chakrabarty –

use common names for biographies on wikipedia, not full names Gareth Jones (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Unless he is known by his full name (like Sarah Jessica Parker or Billy Bob Thornton).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment May be not as clear-cut as that. The transliteration suggests that his real name is Anandamohan, and that this is styled in English as Ananda Mohan, in which case the full name would be appropriate. Skinsmoke (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeIts clear that in most papers his name is noted as AM Chakrabarty. As an author, he must have provided it. If Ananda Chakrabarty was the way preferred, he would have noted his name as A. Chakrabarty, as per usual first name abbreviation. In the first reference on patent, his name is noted as Ananda M. Chakrabarty. Another thing is that his name appears in school text books in India, and it is the full name. Common Name always may not be about internet appearance only.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Skinsmoke and GDibyendu. --BDD (talk) 20:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]