Talk:Andronikos Doukas (co-emperor)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: KAVEBEAR (talk · contribs) 02:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- It seems Konstantios Doukas, Andronikos Doukas (co-emperor) and Constantine Doukas (co-emperor) are all related and their co-reigns crossed paths with each other. Can you mention the other two in each of these respective articles?...Konstantios is mentioned. Did he have any interactions with his nephew Constantine Doukas (co-emperor) or did his elevation happen after Andronikos? -KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @KAVEBEAR: In the case of Constantine I think it would be hard to mention him any further than in the infobox while still remaining on topic. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- It seems Konstantios Doukas, Andronikos Doukas (co-emperor) and Constantine Doukas (co-emperor) are all related and their co-reigns crossed paths with each other. Can you mention the other two in each of these respective articles?...Konstantios is mentioned. Did he have any interactions with his nephew Constantine Doukas (co-emperor) or did his elevation happen after Andronikos? -KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Prose looks good. Just a few points besides the above comment.
- I like the prose here. It is well written and concise. Are there any information remaining untold about Andronikos Doukas that is not on this article?
- None that I have found. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Can you link the two Diogenes co-emperors? Is there a way to help readers navigate the host of co-emperors that reign during this period?
- Done
- Can you also list the co-emperors in the infoboxes for Romanos IV Diogenes and Constantine X Doukas like on Michael VII Doukas to help as well?KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Because they're seperate articles, I will do that when I get around to those pages. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- I like the prose here. It is well written and concise. Are there any information remaining untold about Andronikos Doukas that is not on this article?
- @KAVEBEAR: Believe I have done all you have asked. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. It was just on hold for that last bit and the answers to my question. Looks good, passing now.KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:09, 30 July 2018 (UTC)