Talk:Ann Bannon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleAnn Bannon is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 15, 2010.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 28, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
October 5, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
October 19, 2007Good article nomineeListed
December 3, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
July 15, 2010Today's featured articleMain Page
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 15, 2017, and September 15, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ann Bannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ann Bannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ann Bannon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Novel presentation[edit]

I'm a little reluctant to make any major changes to this article on my own, since it has FA status. However, calling out that Bannon wrote six novels, all a part of the same series, and then giving only five of those novels their own section seems off. I assume The Marriage is given shorter shrift because it is not as reflective of the lesbian themes in the other books in the series, and therefore is less critical to the Bannon story or understanding her oeuvre. However, the absence of a section for it is confusing when a reader is expecting to see six, and it's also a little odd that there is no separate discussion at all about a book that serves as both the chronological conclusion to the series and is a full entry. Even if there isn't as much to say about it, it makes sense to give it a subsection of its own, since glomming it onto the Journey to a Woman section seems unsatisfactory. Thoughts? Grandpallama (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some perusal off-wiki of literary discussion seems to suggest that The Marriage is considered a related novel, but not actually a part of the series proper. So perhaps it makes sense not to give it its own section, but instead to revise the lede to indicate the series is of five books, with one related side novel that includes some of the same characters? Grandpallama (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography section[edit]

I changed the Bibliography section to a sub-section (it is "part" of the "References" section) and the name to "References cited" (some use "Works cited") per MOS:NOTES: "Bibliography" may be confused with the complete list of printed works by the subject of a biography ("Works" or "Publications").
It is not a major change and has valid reasoning, inline with MOS and other articles, and less confusing. Thanks, Otr500 (talk) 07:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who did she write her letter to?[edit]

The article says she wrote to “Marijane Meaker (Vin Parker's name ).” If she did, where did she learn that name, which has not been mentioned before, to write to her? I suspect that she wrote to Vin Parker, who was listed as the author of the book she liked, and Parker wrote back as Meaker. There may be an explanation as to why she wrote to Meaker, but the article doesn’t give it. Wis2fan (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]