Talk:Ardwick railway station

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Manchester Lines North.

Main Line platforms[edit]

I'm pretty sure that there were once platforms on the WCML (ex-London & North Western) lines at Ardwick, and that they were closed in 1902. Can anyone confirm this? Tonythepixel (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wheelchair access[edit]

The article as it stands states that "Access is from a footbridge, so wheelchair access is impossible". However, as footbridges can be equipped with lifts, this seems like an odd statement to make. Clearly what is intended is to communicate that the footbridge in this case does not have lifts - but it could also be read as meaning that for some unstated reason that this particular footbridge could not possibly be equipped with lifts. This would actually be pretty notable if verifiable. Can anyone shed light on the actual intent of this sentence or supply a source? --Peeky44 _{What's on your mind?} 23:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reworded, hopefully all happy. MisterVodka (talk) 20:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]