Talk:Armenian alphabet

This page needs to be fixed

A few things seem wrong to me, but i want someone else to confirm my thoughts before making changes. In eastern Armenian letter "ու", "oo", should be part of the alphabet where "ւ" is, and the letter և, "yev", should be 37, making the total number of leters in the alphabet 39. Or at least thats what I remember from my few years of school in Yerevan. Can someone let me know if I'm wrong, or fix the page if I am right. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.84.56.236 (talk • contribs).

<և> is a ligature, not a letter. We've got a section now on how <ու> replaces <ւ> as the 34^the under Reformed Armenian orthography. Serouj 20:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Hiun

Why in the Alphabet "34 Hiun", but under "Modifiers and punctuation" the small ligature "Ech` Wiwn"? Hiun and Wiwn is the same letter, isn't it? Same with "5 Yech`" and "Ech`". DorisAntony 08:58, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Hiun and Wiwn aren't the same letter in this case. The Wiwn in question is part of a ligature, and in this case is only used to mean "and" (as opposed to a letter like IJ). As a separate concern, I'm wondering if someone more knowledgable in this alphabet than I could have a column for the IPA transcription of the letters. Melange Thief 08:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Diphthong?

I've recently come across "ու" which translates as ou or oo but is correctly spelled u, so is this a diphthong or not? I don't see any information about it on the page if someone could write a bit about it please.ZlatkoT 03:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

<Ու> is a monophthong that represents the sound [u]. In Traditional Armenian orthography, <ու> is considered written using the two distinct letters <ո> and <ւ>. Reformed Armenian orthography considers <ու> as a separate letter (replacing <ւ> as the 34^th letter of the Armenian alphabet). Serouj 20:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

800x600

this page looks awful on 800x600 screens

Vandalism

"Armenian has two different dialects: Eastern and Western.No it doesnt. Both use the same alphabet, however some of the letters have different names and pronunciations."

I couldn't help but laugh when I read this. I am deleting the "No it doesn't" whoever put it there.--Kagan the Barbarian 17:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

IPA

Can we get an IPA column in the chart? --YellowLeftHand 17:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

This has been fixed for some time now. Serouj 20:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Opposing but complemntary pronunciation of letter pairs

Since many of the letter pairs have opposing but complementary pronunciation between the eastern and western dialects, like eastern Ben/Peh (b/p) vs. western Pen/Beh (p/b) and eastern Gim/Ken (g/k) vs. western Keem/Gen (k/g), maybe it's reasonable to clarify whether words are spelled using opposing letters and pronouned the same or spelled using the same letters and pronounced opposingly. Does this make since at all?

Being an Arabic speaker I can think of examples where Arabic is sometimes spelt differently in common speach, specially on the web, according to the local pronounciation of the letter; and I wonder if this is the case. --Alif 19:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Alif.

There are three issues to take into consideration when analyzing the various "flavors" of the Armenian language.

1. Grammar / dialect

i. Eastern Armenian

ii. Western Armenian

This mainly has to do with noun declension and verb conjugation (and to a lesser extent, word choice - e.g. when synonyms are involved).

2. Pronunciation of Letters

i. Eastern

ii. Western

Eastern Armenian pronunciation of letters is the more "authentic," traditional pronunciation. Overtime, Western Armenians, being closer (geographically) to Europe evolved the pronunciation, keeping only those consonant phonemes in common with Romance languages. (A minor note here is that only Armenians from Iran correctly differentiate between ր and ռ, since both Western Armenians and Eastern Armenians from Armenia trill them both in practice, even though they might be aware that only ռ should be trilled.)

3. Spelling / orthography

i. Mashdotsian orthography (a.k.a. traditional spelling, classical spelling) - Used by the Armenian Diaspora (including all Western Armenian speakers)

ii. Reformed orthography (a.k.a. Soviet orthography, Hayasdanian orthography) - Used mainly in Armenia and Russia

Note that not all Eastern Armenians use the Reformed orthography; all Armenians in Iran use traditional orthography, and some Armenians in Armenia (notably many academics and many in the Armenian church) use traditional orthography, too.

Serouj 21:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

To answer your question more directly in a nutshell, words are spelled the same but pronounced differently (between Western Armenian speakers - who always write using traditional spelling - and Eastern Armenian speakers (if the Eastern Armenian speakers in question are using traditional spelling, too). However, if the Eastern Armenian speakers in question use Reformed spelling (as do most Armenians living in Armenia), then most words are spelled the same, except for some words that are spelled differently between Classical orthography and Reformed orthography (...). Serouj 22:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Alveolar approximant

I suggest that the correct expression of ր is not a simple [ɹ] (alveolar approximant) but like [r̝] in Czech (see here). Is this correct? --Ulf-S. 12:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I dont think this is correct. The Armenian letter having alveolar trill is ռ (the 28th letter), ր (the 32nd) is correctly denoted as alveolar approximant. TeakTak 18:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

և, dictionaries and the origin of compounds

Whoever wrote the 9th sidenote under the alphabet not only was far away from knowing Eastern Armenian, but must have been really angry at it. Firstly the second part of the 9th sidenote under the alphabet is a total absurd. The name Երևան, Երեվան (Yerevan is etymologically derived from Էրեբունի, (Erebuni), the name of the fortress, that put the begining of human settlement at the site of present Yerevan. Thus there is no "van" compound to the word Yerevan.
Furthemore, the name Ստեփանավան (Ստեպանավան in the Western Armenian diction, Stepanavan) is formed from Stepan + avan. The first one being the first name of Stepan Shaumyan (an armenian revolutionary whose name was also put into the name of Stepanakert, and the Shaumyan region in Nagorno Karabakh Republic, the second word - ավան (avan) is Armenian for small town, village. So there is no (van) compound to Stepanavan either.
Further yet, the spelling rules of Eastern Armenian contain a rule that explicitely prohibits the usage of և if it modifies the spelling of the compound roots, thus the explanation give there was not only a use of bad example, but totally wrong.

Better yet, the first part about the order and how it is formed in the dictionaries must have been writen by a person who had never held an Eastern Armenian dictionary in his/her hand. As there is no capitalization of և, the proper names starting in "ev" in Eastern Armenian are writen as "Եվ", thus the rule described above (that prohibits the usage of the ligature if it modifies the original) would make it wrong to transform the ”Եվ” into ”և” when forming derivatives from word spelled with ”Եվ”...

Both this article, and the article Spelling reform of the Armenian language 1922-1924 almost make it sound like the reformers, as well as the users of Eastern Armenian are complete morons. And since I wouldnt even know where to begin editing them (without pretty much rewriting them from scratch), I thought to bring the obvious inaccuracy to the attention of those maintaining these articles.TeakTak 00:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your remarks. Is the current version acceptable for you? Ulf-S. 10:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Ulf-S, I am not trying to mock the efforts of those who put them into this article, but the entire article is less than acceptable. For example in the section of the names of the letters there is a statement about them not having been taught at the schools of Soviet Armenia, which isn't only not true, but creates a false impression of existing political pressure on those who did teach it. That's why the tag of missing references is the best thing that is doable to this article at this point, since I certainly dont want to create an edit war, and putting a long explanation of why I made each of the edits is not very high on my time-priority list. And everyone who made a contribution to the article should probably try and find a reference for every claim made. At least that's my understanding of what a Wikipedia article is. And time permitting I'll try to skim through it and bring other particular inaccuracies to the attention of the article maintainers.

Dear TeakTak, My source -- Lehrbuch der armenischen Sprache (Textbook of The Armenian Language) by Margret Eggenstein-Harutunian -- says: “Nowadays, the names are mentioned in schoolbooks but not taught.” Moreover, I do not know a single Armenian who knows the names because of attending school in Soviet Armenia. If you do not protest I will change the sentence of the article in “mentioned but not taught”. Sorry, the sentence was misleading. There will not be an edit war. The problem is that there are so far no really competent editors. Ulf-S. 19:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Ulf-S. 19:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I guess we'll just find the "truth" in our continual discussion :). Can't say I am familiar with the book you quoted, but I dont understand what kind of "teaching" the letter names beyond mentioning and assigning them to learn is expected, this isn't quite the rocket science that you need to spend years explaining... And the logic of not knowing a single Armenian who knows the names because of attending school is not really bullet-proof. I don't know many people who can list all the punctuation signs of Armenian, doesnt mean they weren't taught it in school (or even remeber being taught them in school). The names of letters is not something you remember beyond the month you were taught it in, due to the lack of usage in everyday life. And it's not customary in Armenian to spell a word by using their alphabet names, as it is in English, which makes everyone know and always remember the alphabet pronounciation of the letters in the English alphabet. But believe me, and I say this having know several generations of school attendants as well as teachers of Armenian in Soviet Armenia, the letter names were taught in the schools. They weren't made a subject of worship, but you were supposed to learn and recite them by heart for a grade (sure enough you were let to forget it in a week). But of course I never made a point of digging up references for this, since this was always a common and easily veryfiable truth.
Besides, what's the point of giving the letter names in Armenian? People who know Armenian wouldn't probably need this article at all, and those who cant read Armenian, wouldn't know what the names of the letters are, since they can't read them... Wouldn't it be better to include their IPA transcripts in the alphabet table? TeakTak 13:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

In the old chart the names were included but it was not sufficiant and partially incorrect (f.e. transliteration and transcription were mixed up). The current chart is already big and I would prefer not to enlarge it. Of course, I can add IPA. Eastern Armenians have -- in contrast to me -- no problems to distinguish ճ and չ but do not understand me when I say ճե or չա. So this section is definately one that could be interesting for both native speakers (who often do not know them) and learners (when I heard f.e. ճիշտ for the first time I could only guess the diction). Generally, native speakers can find information about the history of the alphabet (some Armenians I met in Russia even do not know the alphabet and I assume that there are such Armenians in the English-speaking world too).

The point about “taught” is that when people read this they likely conclude that it is like in English. Maybe something like “mentioned in schoolbooks and principally taught but as pupils are not ought to know them only few people use the names at school and in daily life” (if this does not sound strange). Ulf-S. 19:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Then how about creating two charts, one for Eastern Armenian pronounciation/letter names/transliteration and one with Western Armenian, and then even include a chart of comaprisons between the differing pronounciations in the different dialects, now that's something I, and I think many Armenians and non-Armenians would be interested in (seldom one knows all the pronounciations of both Western Armenian and Eastern Armenian). As of now, the chart is not very readable in the sense of comparison, the confusion with the order of the last 4 letters, etc.

As to the letter names a simple "the letter names are not used in everyday life, and unlike English, it's not customary for speakers of Armenian to use the names for aloud spelling purposes, thus these names are not widely know even in Armenian speaking communities, even though they are taught as part of the elementary school curriculum." will solve the issue, and I dont quite understand why there should be any difference between the Western Armenian communities and the Eastern Armenian communities (which is implied by the inclusion of the statement about them not being taught in Soviet Armenia -> not known). TeakTak 23:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I hope the current version about the names is acceptable. I think the current chart is good taking into consideration that the history of the Armenian alphabet is in fact intangled and therefore there cannot exist a chart what makes understandable everything at the fisrt glance. The advantage of one chart is the one can easily compare the differnces in pronunciation. The alternative to one chart are at least three (for Classical, Eastern and Western) or four (for Eastern Armenian in the traditional orthography). Are the following spellings correct? կետ, ստորակետ, շեշտ, բացականչական նշան, բութ, հարցական նշան, պատիվ, ենթամնայ. Can you say the names of the others? I want to rewrite the section “Punctuation Marks”. Ulf-S. 21:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

The history is indeed intangled, but the proposal was about the common usages of literary Eastern Armenian and literary Western Armenian. Grabar, while being an interesting version of the language (both from historic and linguistic points of view) has nothing to do in this question. All I was suggesting is the alphabet is use in the present day Armenian in its two literary variants. The alternative to his would actually be listing all the dialects of Armenian, which is an impossible task. And I do still think that there can and should be an easily readable chart of phonetic correspondence between the pronountiations of letters in literary Eastern and Western Armenian. I'll hopefully get to the alphabet article in hy: soon, and would like to use this chart as a starting point, but in the meantime I'll think about how to incorporate either everthing together, or a good way of breaking things into 2-3 charts. There is a need for easily readable comparison...

I added a punctuation section to hy:Հայերեն (#Կետադրություն) couple of days ago, it contains all the signs in use. Let me know if you need anything else. TeakTak 02:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Small error

In the Image with the caption "This word (Hayastanee) means Armenia" That is untrue, the correct way to say it is Haysatan. The image is also wrong, that last character needs to chopped off. In it's current form, it implies ownership. Like "America's" as opposed to America.

So, chop off the last character, ի, needs to be gotten rid of, and the caption should read: "This word (Hayastan) means Armenia"

surprised its gone so long without anyone noticing. Someone else fix, as I don't know how to image edits and uploads, nor do I want to fuck around with the formatting.

Thanks. Fixed this a couple of weeks ago with by removing this image, replacing it with հանրագիտարան (the word for encyclopedia in Armenian). Serouj 21:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Question: Armenian և (unicode 0587)

I have a question relating to some information in this article and discussion page pertaining to a particular Armenian character, և (0587 in Unicode). As I know next to nothing about the Armenian language, I am hoping someone here can help me to clarify the issue.

In the article itself, the "Letters" table shows և in the minuscule column, and in the majuscule column to the left it shows (ԵՎ). That և is a ligature of ե and վ is also mentioned above on this discussion page. This is consistent with what I have found on a couple of other web resources (e.g. here and here), as well as some printed (Eastern) Armenian books.

However, in the Unicode Standard, 0587 և is listed as ARMENIAN SMALL LIGATURE ECH YIWN, indicating that it is the equivalent of ե and ւ (0565+0582). In the Unicode special casing file, it shows the uppercase equivalent of և for ALL CAPS text as being ԵՒ(0535 + 0552), or a direct uppercase mapping of եւ. This is not consistent with the information found here or in the other sources mentioned in the paragraph above.

So my questions for this forum are:
What is the reason for this discrepancy?
Is և a actually a ligature of եվ, or of եւ?
What reason might there be for the Unicode standard to list և as being compatible with 0565+0582 (եւ) rather than 0565+057E (եվ)?
Is this discrepency related to differences between Western and Easter Armenian in some way?

Any explanations or clarifications on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

--MattMadden 20:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

That's probably one of the errors of the Soviet orthography (a.k.a. Reformed spelling), whose changes to the Armenian alphabet were imperfect. There are two ways to say "and" in Armenian: ու and եւ. In soviet orthography, the letter ւ is always replaced by the letter վ when it's used to make the "v" sound. (ու is kept ու since the ւ is not pronounced as a "v" but rather ու is pronounced "oo" as in "goo".) You only see և used in Soviet orthography; classical (Mashdotsian) orthography continues to used եւ, and և really is an ampersand (&). Hence, since և is prounouced "yev," it is written as եվ (not եւ) in soviet orthography; and the capital of եվ is ԵՎ. Hope that helps. (related article: Spelling_reform_of_the_Armenian_language_1922-1924)Serouj 20:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Soviet Armenian made use of a capital Ech Yiwn ligature as well. This has not been encoded, and it is not possible to represent some Soviet-era text without it. -- Evertype·✆ 21:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I have never seen a capital ligature for ԵՒ. How is it used? I know that Երան, for example, is always spelled ԵՐԵՎԱՆ in all caps in Soviet Armenian. Sclerolith (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I would rather compare և to the German letter ß, which is a ligature of s and z. With rare exceptions, it is replaced with SS rather than SZ in all caps or when the symbol ß is missing from the font. Similar to և, ß does not have a capital representation. Unlike &, which is only used to represent the word "et", the letter և is not only used to represent the word եւ. The reason why the ligature և is represented by ԵՎ is that Eastern Armenian spelling is different from Western Armenian: the Eastern վ replaces the Western ւ as well as ու where it is pronounced as a consonant. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the only position the letter վ is used in Western Armenian is at the beginning of a word or after ո. 99.120.96.24 (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

I am grossly uninformed regarding the Armenian language, so please forgive me if this question seems obtuse. What is the difference, then, between Eastern (Soviet) Armenian and Western (Classical) Armenian? I know that the orthography is different, but this character actually decomposes in two different ways, depending on where I’m at geographically. ISO 639-3 only defines “Armenian” and makes no distinction between Eastern and Western. How can the difference be resolved, if I am developing content in both languages/dialects from a single application? Should ISO 639-3 define one code for Eastern and another for Western?

--Mhambster 18:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Armenian letter names

"There are traditional names for the letters but they are not used in everyday life, and unlike English, it's not customary for speakers of Armenian to use the names for aloud spelling purposes, thus these names are not widely know even in Armenian speaking communities, even though they are taught as part of the elementary school curriculum."

This statement is simply not true. (I'm speaking at least on behalf of Western Armenian speakers.) The letter names are used for spelling purposes particularly in Western Armenian wherein two letters may sound the same if simply pronounced (e.g. բ and փ are both pronounced as a p), making it necessary to annunciate the letters of the names (e.g. բեն - pen - and փիւր - pyur).

I think the above quote is not necessary for this article, and simply shows a lack of education and awareness by some Armenian speakers.Serouj 05:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

In the notes following the alphabet table, the pronunication of some letter names is not accurate. For one thing, [y] and [j] are used inconsistently (cf. [tʼyun] vs. [pʰjuɾ]). Besides, there is no distinct [j] sound there. It's more like an onglide in an ascending or catachrestic diphthong: [tʼɪ̯un], [pʰɪ̯uɾ]. Sclerolith (talk) 20:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Ligatures

I am proposing that we place <և> under a new "Ligatures" section (please see the Greek alphabet for an example), and removed from the Main Alphabet table, and that we remove <ու> from the main Alphabet table.

1. In both dialects of modern Armenian, և is used as a ligature. In reformed orthography, it seems that և was introduced as a ligature, but incorrectly started being used between words as well. (the Unicode standard considers և a ligature)
2. <Ու> is simply not a letter; it is the combination of two distinct letters, <ո> and <ւ>. (the Unicode standard neither notes <ու> as a letter, nor a ligature.) Serouj 19:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Parent and Sister Writing Systems

There seems to be some inconsistency across Wikipedia articles on this one: Genealogy of scripts derived from Proto-Sinaitic places the Armenian alphabet under the Greek, and Georgian under Syriac.

It's my understanding that the Armenian language was an original invention by Mashdots; however, I do recall reading somewhere that he had mastered Greek and Syriac, and was probably inspired by them. (The Armenian alphabet also has sounds that don't exist in Greek, not sure about Syriac, though).

Perhaps the Genealogy article needs some work, too. Serouj 11:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Ա

Incorrect statement about և ligature

The article states incorrectly that: “և ligature was introduced in reformed Armenian orthography in the 1920s, and is similar to the ampersand in Latin.” In reality և ligature was introduced in the 5th century by Mesrop Mashtoc and has been in wide use ever since. To those who still think that “և was introduced in reformed Armenian orthography in the 1920s” I would recommend to walk to Matenadaran where they can see with their own eyes the vast number of ancient Armenian manuscripts all of which use և ligature. A quick search on google found this page of ancient Armenian manuscripts all of which again use the և ligature throughout. Both between words and withing words. The first Armenian printed book (published in 1666) also used և ligature along with many other Armenian ligatures. In fact the use of և ligature was so common and pervasive that in 1920s it has become a separate letter of the Armenian alphabet.

It is not new but now it is considered as an own letter whereas մն is still seen as a ligature. In the past both were considered to be ligatures. The current spelling of Europe in Eastern Armenian is ԵՎրոպա (EVropa). No mistake! I hate it, too, but that is the way they do it (the adjective is written ևրոպային (e͡wropayin)). It is the same with ու -- they really consider it to be one letter. de:user:Kuddeldaddeldu

ejectives?

East Arm. is listed with ejective reflexes of Classical tenuis C's. This contradicts the phonology section of Armenian language. Which is correct? kwami (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Ejectives occur only in some dialects. Kuddeldaddeldu (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The Armenian language article needs to be updated. Serouj (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Very Poor Article

• The ancient pronunciation of Է was [e]. This explains the switch to [i]. E.g. sér > sirel, Yovhannés, Yovhannisean.

• In Classical Armenian, ե was initially pronounced without [j].

• The Eastern pronunciation ist not [lyn] but [ljun].

• What is "[ts’]"??? Only [ts] is correct.

• What is "[k’]" regarding կ??? Only [k] ist correct.

• Same with "[at’]".

• "ո [o], initially [vo]". (i) This is a Close-mid back unrounded vowel. Lay your fingers at your lips while pronouncing it and you will feel the difference to the rounded version [o]. (ii) The anciant initial pronunciation is without [v]. That's why some Armenian scholars promoted a new diction in the Middle Ages (without success). E.g. վոտ instead of ոտ.

• "became /u/". No, Armenians use the Close back unrounded vowel. Consequently, Esatern Armenians do not say [tyn] but [tjɯ n].

• What is "[p’]"??? Only [p] ist correct.

• The diction ւիւն should be mentioned. The Eastern pronunciation is not [hyn] but [hjɯn] or [vjɯn].

• "[ɹɛ]6 In practice, only Iranian-Armenians say [ɹ]; Eastern Armenians from the Republic of Armenia have shifted the Classical Armenian [ɹ] (ր) to [ɾ]." Sorry, this is just nonsense. Yes, there are some (!) words which are widely (not exclusively!) pronounced with [r], e.g. eresown. But note, that there is offen an ancient connection between ր and ռ: the adjective եռամեայ (three-year) has always been written with ռ.

I am not an Armenian speaker myself, but it has been my observation that Armenians from Yerevan do not pronounce ր and ռ the same way. The difference is especially noticeable in the word-final position, where ռ is rolled while ր sounds like the Czech ř. In other positions, the pronunciation is [r] and [ɾ], respectively. It doesn't seem right to use the same symbol to show the pronunciation of these consonants in the main table. Sclerolith (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

• There is no classical pronunciation of օ. If there were any, it had to be [aw]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuddeldaddeldu (talk • contribs) 09:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

• What is "[ts’]"??? Only [ts] is correct.

The apostrophe represents an ejective Serouj (talk) 10:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• What is "[k’]" regarding կ??? Only [k] ist correct.

Again, the apostrophe represents an ejective Serouj (talk) 10:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• The Eastern pronunciation ist not [lyn] but [ljun].

This is correct only for Eastern Armenian spoken mostly in the Armenian Republic (noted in the Notes section below the main table). Iranian Armenian pronounce իւ as [ʏ] for the most part. Serouj (talk) 10:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

But ejectives are not typical for Eastern Armenian in general. Kuddeldaddeldu (talk) 14:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, nearly all speakers of Eastern Armenian use ejectives -- both in the Republic of Armenia as well as those from Iran. It is Western Armenian that does not contain ejectives. Some examples in Eastern Armenian are: ծ, կ, ճ, պ, տ. (I think that's all of them.) Serouj (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I was surprised when I read in Wikipedia that the Armenian ծ, կ, ճ, պ, տ were treated simply as unaspirated consonants whereas their Georgian counterparts წ, კ, ჭ, პ, ტ were treated as ejectives. So I asked a native Armenian speaker and a native Georgian speaker listen to each other pronounce these sounds. They found no difference. Sclerolith (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Sclerolith, look more closely -- in the main table for this article, notice that there is an apostrophe symbol (') after each letter's IPA under eastern Armenian. The ejectives exist only under Eastern Armenian. They exist neither in Classical Armenian nor Western Armenian -- it is most likely the influence of the Georgian language on the Eastern Armenian dialect -- keep in mind that Tbilisi was the center of Eastern Armenian culture during the 19th century to early 20th century. Serouj (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I apologize for the confusion. I was referring to the Armenian language article, which you, Serouj, said needed to be updated. Sclerolith (talk) 16:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Ethiopian Influence

One needs to stress more the fact that Saint Mesrob may have been influenced by the Ethiopian Bibles found in the Caucasian Monasteries while creating the Armenian Alphabet. Although it is clear that the letter order is of Greek influence, that would suit better an indo-european language such as Armenian, it is clear that the shapes, except some letters, are of Amharic origin.

Cheers! --Eae1983 (talk) 18:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

PS: While doing this, I am also conducting a research to prove that the Georgian Alphabet is also an invention of Saint Mesrob, anyone knowledgeable enough to help me with that? I have Carl Faulmann's theories on the subject.

It is more likely that the similarities with Ethiopian are just a coincidence. The similarities with Georgian are a result of the influence from the Aramaic derived Pahlavi on both Georgian and Armenian.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 23:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Middle Armenian

An anonymous user has added data on "Middle Armenian" to the Armenian alphabet. I propose removal of this section:

1. Because there is no supporting evidence.
2. It is highly doubtful that "Middle Armenian" was spoken the same in Ottoman vs Persian/Russian Armenian (let alone ALL of Armenia).
3. Even if it IS backed by evidence, "Middle Armenian" is very minor to be included in this article, and that information may be simply placed in the Middle Armenian article itself. This table is already WAY too crowded. Serouj (talk) 05:38, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Go for it. kwami (talk) 05:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Done.Serouj (talk) 23:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't have a wikipedia account, but Middle Armenian is usually understood to be the literary language of Cilicia. Its voicing qualities were closer to Modern Western than Modern Eastern (identical with modern Cilicia and Sasun dialects), as evidenced by the spellings of the borrowings from French cruisaders such as baron and prints. The voicing qualities of Middle Armenian are described by many linguists:

Garrett, Andrew. 1991. Indo-European Reconstruction and Historical Methodologies. Language 67, 790-804.

Garrett, Andrew. 1998. Adjarian’s Law, the Glottalic Theory and the Position of Armenian. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society; Special Session on Indo-European Subgrouping and Internal Relations, 12-23.

Kortlandt, Frederik. 1985. Proto-Indo-European Glottalic Stops: The Comparative Evidence. Folia Linguistica Historica VI:2, 183-201.

Kortlandt, Frederik. 1989. The Making of a Puzzle. Annual of Armenian Linguistics, 10, 43-52.

Pisowicz, Andrzej. 1976. Le développement du consonantisme arménien. Wrocaw : Zakod Narodwy imienia Ossolinskich.

Vaux, Bert. 1998. The Phonology of Armenian. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Vogt, Hans. 1988. Les occlusives de l’arménien (originally published in 1958). In: Hovdhaugen, Even & Fridrik Thordarson (eds.), Studia Caucasologica II: Linguistique caucasienne et arménienne. Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 430-448. 69.157.128.50 (talk) 03:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Armenian alphabet is NOT based on Greek, but an independent creation

The Armenian alphabet is not a child system of the Greek alphabet. There have been many scholarly debates about this issue in the past (since the end of the 19th century), with some classifying the Armenian script as Greek (Lepsius (1855), Lagarde (1883) and Hübschmann (1897) Gardthausen (1876 and 1921), others as Aramaic (Friedrich Müller (1864), Isaac Taylor (1883), J. Marquart (1917), Strzygowski (1918), H. Junker (1925, 1926) and Jensen (1935) ). That was the debate of the "old generation". Today, everybody agrees that while three letters hyun, pyur and ke are direct adaptions from the Greek alphabet and the general vowel designating system is inspired by the Greek system, the Armenian alphabet is essentially a free invention inspired by all surrounding alphabets at the time of its creation, i.e. the various Persian Pahlavi alphabets (based on Aramaic and very clearly illustrated e.g. in the Armenian ayb [a]) and amongst others also the Greek alphabet (I have cited leading modern scholars who come to this conclusion). I would thus suggest removing the Armenian alphabet as a child system of the Greek or any other alphabet and classify it as an independent alphabet with only the Georgian (also created by Mashtots) and the Caucasus-Albanian ones as sisters.

Selected Literature:

For the historical discussion of the various theories:

JENSEN, HANS, Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Glückstadt, Hamburg: J. J. Augustin, 1935

Up to date books:

HAARMANN, HARALD, Universalgeschichte der Schrift. 2., durchges. Auflage. Frankfurt/Main, New York: Campus Verlag, 1991

SCHMITT, RÜDIGER, Grammatik des Klassisch-Armenischen mit sprachvergleichenden Erläuterungen. 2., durchgesehene Auflage. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck, 2007

DANIELS, PETER T. (Hg.) und BRIGHT, WILLIAM (Hg.), The World’s Writing Systems. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1996 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.167.154.82 (talk) 23:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Like Georgian, the Armenian alphabet is strongly influenced by Pahlavi but it's structure and the fact that it's written from right to left stems from Greek.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 00:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

No reason to think that Armenian and Georgian are sisters. kwami (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I concur. The similarities between Armenian and Georgian are due to the fact that both alphabets are very strongly influenced by Pahlavi, a script which was used by the pre-Christian priestly class in both nations.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 01:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I assume Greek was the language of the Christianity that was introduced? kwami (talk) 05:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Primarily but Syriac as well.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 17:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Georgian alphabet

""Medieval Armenian sources also claim that Mashtots invented the Georgian [...] alphabet around the same time."" - An old tall story but can anyone quote this so-called "mediaval armenian sources"?!...... Thanks!--Serafita (talk) 09:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

By the way, one of my austrian guest told me an anecdote how Mashtots come up with this invention. He just was eating spaghetti when a miserable georgian come to him and begged for the food. Mashtots dropped him spaghetti.(And he inspired by this vowed noodles lying on the soil what was a caus to create georgian letters). And this even several century befor the Italians invented macaroni! --Serafita (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, to be sure, the old (original) Georgian script (the Asomtavruli script) does look suspiciously similar to Armenian... Indeed, some are exact copies of Armenian letters. (e.g. Ⴅ, Ⴡ, Ⴎ, Ⴐ, Ⴕ, Ⴖ, Ⴘ, etc, etc) Serouj (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I ask myself: Why Armenians hit up on an idea that they are a centre of the world?! It could be even very opposite! Couldn't? Why can't be Armenian letters "exact copies " of the Georgian's? --Serafita (talk) 06:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps because the Armenian alphabet was clearly invented by Mashdots? And that the early Georgian alphabet does not have a clear author, other than medieval Armenian sources claiming it was invented by Mashdots. Also how some Armenian churches were appropriated by Georgians and later claimed to be Georgian (e.g. Banak Cathedral and now many churches in Georgia proper.) Serouj (talk) 07:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

"And that the early Georgian alphabet does not have a clear author..." - my dear Serouj, it can't be a cause for the thought the explanation all of the covered things in Armenian to seek. About Bana Cathedral entered a georgian balanced user very usufel informations. When you something objection against have can dispute with this user I think. "Also how some Armenian churches were appropriated by Georgians and later claimed to be Georgian ([...] many churches in Georgia proper.)" - it requres to be good proved! And it is an typical armenian tall story too with like inaccuraces accuse georgians. Isn't yet the time to free onself from the role of victims?!... " "[...] many churches in Georgia [...]". Please enter the names of those churches!!! My best regards! --Serafita (talk) 08:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

There is a good book on this topic by Research on Armenian Architecture (the particular volume on Armenian churches in Georgia). Their website seems to be down at the moment... There is a prominent dispute now going on for 17 years over an Armenian church in Tbilisi called Norashen Church. This has included defacing Armenian inscription on the church by a Georgian priest and the bringing in of stones with Georgian inscriptions from an unknown cemetery. Among others:

1. S. Gevorg of Mughni Church in Tbilisi
2. S. Astvatsatsin Church of Bethlehem in Tbilisi
3. S. Stepanos Convent in Tbilisi (destroyed)
4. Karap S. George Church of Tbilisi
5. Karmir Avetaran Church of Tbilisi (blown up)
6. Armenian Pantheon of Tbilisi (Armenian cemetery whose Armenian-inscribed stones have been removed)

Clearly, this is a state-sponsored cultural genocide of Armenian history in Georgia. Tiflis was the center of Eastern Armenian culture for centuries. Indeed, many of the mayors of Tiflis were Armenians, including the last one before Georgia gained independence in 1918. (See here for reference) Serouj (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Dear Seroujdjan! First of all I’d like to say something about the so often mentioned Tbilisi-population before the XX century. I’m astonished why not any Armenian makes mention of the population of Erevan at the same time. I’d point you at this circumstance: The majority of population in Erevan for example in the XIX wasn’t Armenian. Even more: It was Turkish! Secondly, Armenians must grateful to Russia (Russian Empire, Soviet Union) to have nowadays a state with fixed borders! And the genocide, if you want the state-sponsored genocide by Russia (!) must not blend with the so called “machinations” by Georgian state. Even the existence of soviet national states consisted of the titular-nations is to attribute to the early Soviet nationalities policy promoted mostly in the 1920s: Korenizatsiya. Thirdly, I’ve found a list of the armenian cultural heritage (maybe not complete) in Europe: [1]. It is clear – the nation dispersed over the world needs to have places to pray. It isn’t to deny. But to declare all of those places as a part of the Great Armenia it makes a nation with certainly great culture to degrade oneself. I’m sorry about Norashen Church in Tbilisi but I’m sure it must be a firm will by the both sides to find out the future of the controversial churches at last! I know it’s typical for small nations to make their story very big (both Armenians and Georgians!). But I’m very sorry for that Armenians hadn’t found a fixed place between Anatolia and Caucasus yet. As soon as I sources have I’ll inform you of the georgian inscriptions on georgian churches wiped off by Armenians. I’d say such acts will not contribute to the relations between two (I wouldn’t say brotherly but) neighbor states. About over mentioned six armenian churches I will write later. My best regards --Serafita (talk) 13:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Dear Serafita, absolutely. Yerevan was but a village before the first Armenian republic was created. I'm not sure why that would be so relevant to the Armenian population of Tiflis, except that it reinforces the fact that Tiflis was the center of the Eastern Armenian culture (while Constantinople was the center of Western Armenian culture). There were many Armenians living in Baku at the time, too. Sorry if I sometimes misunderstand what you're saying as your English writing is good, but sometimes incomprehensible. All of the Armenian churches aren't claimed to be part of Greater Armenia. Greater Armenia is considered to be the Armenian highland. This does not include Tbilisi! However, it does include the region of Javakheti that is now in Georgia. It also includes Northern Artsakh (now in Azerbaijan, basically the mountainous area east of Lake Sevan and north of the NKR), Artsakh (including NKR), all of the Republic of Armenia (obviously), Nakhichevan, parts of Northwestern Iran, and much of Eastern Turkey that is north of the Taurus mountains and as west as Kharpert (Elazig) and Yerznga (Erzinjan); nevertheless, the cradle of Armenia civilization is the Vaspurakan regiond, which is the area around Lake Van, particularly in the south and eastern parts of it. Do inform me of any Georgian inscription removed from Georgian churches in Armenia. I am not aware of any. Armenians pretty much leave alone the few Georgian churches inside the ROA, except those which were originally Armenian and converted to Georgian by the Zakarids (e.g. Kobayr Monastery). Cheers. Serouj (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Serouj, I can’t make a promise to improve my English in the near future but I will try to express clearly what I have to say. I make it in the near future in any case. Now I would only emphasize: Tbilisi has been remained as a capital city of Georgia since her declaration. But absolute unclear for me why Armenians tried hard to build up eleven capitals, before they declared Yerevan as a twelfth capital city at last. I’m satisfied that Georgians haven’t to seek the lost capitals out of their borders.True! --Serafita (talk) 22:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

You need to brush up on your Georgian history. So the Kingdom of Imereti, Kingdom of Kakheti, Kingdom of Kartli, Kingdom of Hereti, Kingdom of Tao-Klarjeti etc. all shared Tibilisi as their capital? lol Have you ever heard of Kutaisi ?-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 23:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

The original source of that claim is Koryun. Ironically some people claim that he was Georgian. In all likelihood both were independently invented and the similarities are a result of Parthian Pahlavi influences. That script was used widely in Georgia and Armenia during the Arsacid period.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 13:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Very interesting. Serouj (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

About ու and և

Serouj, ու and և are officially the 34th and 37th letters of Armenian alphabet, according to Reformed Armenian Orthography, you must know that. But because they were not historically a part of it, I have separated those two with a (:) sign. This situation is explained in the article's body. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 12:53, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

An alphabet is a set of LETTERS. Ու and եւ are each composed of two letters. They are not letters in themselves. Serouj (talk) 23:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

You are mixing the orthography and alphabet articles. This article is about the Armenian ALPHABET, and not Reformed Armenian orthography. Either way, it is quite ridiculous to say that ու and եւ are letters when they are in fact the juxtaposition of two letters, like իւ or աւ or այ or ոյ... It would be equally silly to say that "ou" or "oo" are letters in English! But if there were some strange English orthography in existence, then those claims would belong there. Serouj (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Reformed Armenian orthography changed not only the orthography, but also the alphabet. Yes, letters can be added to alphabet and removed from it, the order of letters can be changed. Ու was declared an independent letter, this means that words starting with ու are sorted in a dictionary after ց and before փ, and not inside ո. Also, թուք comes after թոք. As for the “ridiculousness” of calling a juxtaposition of two letters an independent letter, see Albanian alphabet where dh, gj, ll, nj, rr, sh, th, xh, zh are letters, or Hungarian alphabet, where cs, dz, dzs (!), gy, ly, ny, sz, ty, zs are letters, or the Serbo-Croatian alphabet, and a host of others. Just because unicode has not assigned a single glyph to ու like it has to nj and ы means nothing: it's a letter. So, unfortunately, is the ligature և. I strongly disagree with Reformed Armenian Orthography and its alphabet, but we're stuck with it and can do nothing.

Also, I object to the removal of the alphabet from the first paragraph. The huge unreadable table below does not replace it. If you go through, say, Category:Latin-derived alphabets, you'll see almost all of them mention the alphabet in the leading paragraph. If you want to save space, we can delete sentence on այբուբեն, instead. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The Armenian alphabet was defined by Mesrob Mshdots and in later years two more letters were added. Ու and եւ are not letters. Period. That can go inside the Reformed Armenian orthography article or later in the same article. Ու and եւ are not letters in Eastern Armenian of Iran, and they are certainly not letters in Western Armenian. This section needs to be revised as it is not accurate: you are mixing dialects (Eastern and Western) with orthography (reformed and traditional) which is incorrect. The alphabet consists of 38 letters. The reformed orthography article can explain that ւ was replaced by ու in reformed orthography and that եւ is also considered some special letter. But this doesn't mean that new letters were added to the alphabet! The alphabet (letters) remained the same. The orthography (spelling) changed, true... Serouj (talk) 19:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Digraphs (like ու and եւ) are not considered letters. Please read the alphabet article as well. Serouj (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

After this edit the section in the first paragraph does not claim anything about the letterness of ու and և: it merely lists the letters and digraphs of Armenian alphabet with pronunciation, and it is important to have the pronunciation of ու among traditional letters, because it's not equal to ո + ւ. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 19:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

An "alphabet" is a set of letters, not digraphs. Ու ([u]) is the same as ո + ւ. It's a digraph. Not a letter. It's like իւ ([ʏ]) which is ի + ւ, or աւ (classical Armenian) which is ա + ւ, or էօ ([œ]) which is է + օ. This doesn't make իւ, աւ, or էօ letters! They are simply digraphs which are composed of two letter. Serouj (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The digraphs belong to the article on orthography, NOT on the alphabet. Look at the English alphabet article. The digraphs (like "sh", "oo", "ch", "ee", etc.) are not enumerated there, only the letters are. This article should follow the same paradigm. Serouj (talk) 21:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I have a feeling that you are using this article as your soapbox for a crusade against Reformed Orthography by which you are visibly annoyed. I am not enabling you anymore. I added a Western Armenian source confirming ու and և are considered letters (not digraphs or whatnot) by 3 million Armenians of Armenia; I can add a wealth of more. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 23:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Umm, you didn't refer to my arguments and instead are making a personal commentary. As I mentioned earlier, you are confusing and mixing Orthography into an article on an Alphabet. Eastern Armenian uses both traditional orthography (in Iran) and reformed (in Armenia). The way you have presented it, it seems in Eatern Armenian ու and եւ are letters, and you further have added them to the Western Armenian. In any case, digraphs are not part of an alphabet, no matter which Armenian children's textbook author says so. I can provide a wealth of sources from San Lazar that show that neither ու nor եւ are part of the alphabet. We should follow the paradigm in the English alphabet article that separates alphabet (letters) from orthography (the usage of those letters, which includes digraphs and trigraphs). Serouj (talk) 05:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Enough of this. Who or what uses what alphabet outside of Armenia is irrelevant. In Armenia ու and և are letters in the alphabet and presented as such in every single schoolbook. ւ has been deprecated and doesn't exist in any shape or form. End of story.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 17:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

The use of the Armenian alphabet outside of Armenia is indeed relevant. Once again, issues of orthography belong to its respective article on orthography: Reformed Armenian orthography and Traditional Armenian orthography. The letters of the Armenian alphabet are the 36 defined by Mesrob Mashdots and the 2 letters (օ and ֆ) some centuries later. Ու and եւ are digraphs that appear in both Eastern and Western Armenian, as well as in both Reformed and Traditional orthographies. In neither case are they "letters". Serouj (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with orthography or Eastern and Western Armenian dialects. The Armenian alphabet has 39 letters that include և and ու (digraph or not). This is the only Armenian alphabet with official recognition in the world, attempting to erase this very obvious fact from this article is futile.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 17:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Not true: in traditional Armenian orthography there are 38 letters, among which ու and եւ are not considered "letters". They are digraphs. Traditional Armenian orthography is used in the Armenian Diaspora as well as in Armenia. All Western Armenian speakers use traditional Armenian orthography and all eastern Armenians from Iran use it as well. In addition, the Armenian church (both Ejmiatsin inside Armenia as well as the diasporan Armenian churches) use traditional Armenian orthography. Anyone with some education in the Armenian language knows this. This issue of orthographies does not belong in the Armenian alphabet article (and at most can be mentioned as a footnote that ւ is not used on its own in reformed orthography but as part of եւ and ու). Serouj (talk) 17:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

That may be so, but so what? Good for them. Foreigners with Armenian heritage have no say in the matter neither does the Church. They could use twelve letters or fifty letters or add Chinese characters for all anyone cares. The fact remains that in Armenia, all official bodies and the government recognize 39 letters of the alphabet that include և and ու but not ւ. The Armenian Academy of Sciences, in charge of regulating the Armenian language does so as well. Stop pushing your political propaganda on Wikipedia.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 00:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Judging by your comments, I think you have no idea of the history of the Armenian alphabet, language, and orthography. You should yield to those who are better trained in this subject. Serouj (talk) 00:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

There is already a footnote in the main alphabet table for the letter Ւ that reads: "In reformed orthography, this letter has been replaced with the monophthong <ու> which represents [u]." The reformed orthography is not a "trumps all" that replaces traditional Armenian orthography. It does not matter that it is used in official documents of the Armenian government. This article isn't about the government of Armenia. Serouj (talk) 14:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

a) Of course it is. b) This has nothing to do with orthography.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 23:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Matenadaran Armenian alphabet.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Matenadaran Armenian alphabet.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Matenadaran Armenian alphabet.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Armenian and Greek alphabets

At the beginning, the article states that the Armenian alphabet was created in 405 or 406 AD. But in the "History and Development" section, we see "Armenian alphabet has been used as a foundation for the Greek alphabet", which is clearly incompatible with that date. It then goes on to say something incomprehensible about Greek borrowing words from Armenian, and the implication seems to be, rather absurdly, that the existence of borrowed words somehow means that the Greek alphabet must be based on the Armenian alphabet. Can someone who knows more about Armenian than I please clean up this silliness? 66.68.80.131 (talk) 13:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Spanish = Armenian

I write the Spanish language with the Armenian alphabet. --198.248.159.19 (talk) 18:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Elvish

There are no evidences of Armenian writing influencing J.R.R Tolkien. Furthermore - the edit says 'Elvish alphabet'. There are actually three Elvish alphabets - so which one of them? None of those are described as being based on Armenian writings. While this statement sounds really odd to me, acknowledging Wikipedia rules, I demand its verification. --Henry McClean (talk) 21:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

I reverted it back in only as part of a series of suspect anon edits. I don't know when or by whom it was added. But after your note here I looked it up and tried to find something, and found nothing whatsoever. One source said 'coincidental similarities between Tengwar and Armenian have been noted', but that's all it said. And that traces only to mirrors of an older version of wikipedia's article Tengwar. So I would say without substantiation, go ahead and remove it. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 22:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Already gone. — kwami (talk) 03:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Total BS

The Armenian alphabet is related to Avestan, Pahlavi and GEEZ SCRIPT. It ONLY has one letter related to Greek. Who wrote this total rubbish? It is OBVIOUS it has nothing to do with Greek. I am adding Geez script and waiting for this to be fixed. --Vitilsky (talk) 01:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, you need sources. Reverted. — kwami (talk) 01:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I got sources. Reverted. --Vitilsky (talk) 14:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

One a bit of religious propaganda and the other that Armenian was based on an alphabet that didn't even exist at the time? Lovely. Try finding sources that are reliable for the topic at hand, per WP:RS. — kwami (talk) 06:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Stop pushing your POV per WP:NPOV, it is NOT religious propaganda unless you can definitely prove such point. There are books referenced from major bookstores with high ratings, one of them WRITTEN BY THE UNESCO. I don't care who first who last, that should be my policy, now PROVE that it derivates from the Greek alphabet. Oh you can't. Btw, stop removing sources or I will report you per Wikipedia:3RR. --Vitilsky (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Also, as you would have noticed, I have not removed any content from the page, even though I dispute the Greek origin of the Armenian alphabet, I don't necessarely deny it. You are showing complete lack of understanding of proper sourcing and consistently try to remove content that is not in line with your views. --Vitilsky (talk) 21:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Either the source is wrong, or you misunderstood it. The Armenian alphabet dates to ca. 400 CE. The Amharic alphabet dates to ca. 1860. (See Encyclopedia of African Literature, European-language Writing in Sub-saharan Africa (vol 2), and Tradition and Change in Ethiopia.) Rather difficult for the latter to be a formative influence on the former. — kwami (talk) 02:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Third opinion here

I see some bitter back-and-forth between two editors here, so thought I'd give my two cents. After reading the latest comment and then looking at the article, I do see a problem with the article. There indeed seems to be a discrepancy between the "infoboxes", which confidently attribute the Abuben's graphic development to the Greek alphabet (though it is true without a source), and the actual article text, which currently seems more cautious and even-handed, when it says: "Various scripts have been credited with being a prototype for the Armenian alphabet. Pahlavi was the priestly script in Armenia before the introduction of Christianity, and Syriac, along with Greek, was one of the alphabets of Christian scripture. It has also been suggested that the Ge'ez script had an influence on certain letters of the alphabet.[5]" This version has the benefit of having a reference present, to the well-known Ethiopisant Richard Pankhurst, although I have not verified it and am accepting it says that on good faith. Since the text does not even state the Greek alphabet as a direct ancestor, and there is no citation, the solution seems to be to request a citation for the infobox claim of Greek and see what comes up. So for these reasons, I am adding a citation request to the infobox claim of Greek parentage. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 00:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I wrote that paragraph, actually, but the source for the general acceptance of a Greek model was deleted somewhere along the line. I just restored it. I neither know nor really care, other than as a point of idle curiosity, where the Armenian script came from. AFAICT, no-one really knows. But saying it derives from Amharic – even linking to the alphabet section of the Amharic language article to clarify that it is actually Amharic that is meant – is rather silly, isn't it? — kwami (talk) 02:27, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I can see what you are trying to say, but the reality is that the Geez script dates to the 5th century BC, which means it could easily have influenced the creation of the Armenian alphabet. I just cannot see why you would accept the Syriac scripts before the Amharic , which could have been borrowed from texts found in Edessa, while it has much more simmilarity in appearance. Now I'm quoting the afforementioned book, which is no case saying anything impossible: "Soon after its creation, the Ethiopic vocalized script began to influence the scripts of Transcaucasia. D.A. Olderogge suggested that Mesrop Mashtotz used the vocalized Ethiopic script when he invented the Armenian alphabet. Not long before this time (at the end of the fifth century) the Ethiopian script may have been introduced into Armenia by the Syrian bishop Daniel." I request the sources to be added again until further proof of invalidation is found. As you can see, it never mentions in that bit the date of the creation of the Ethipian alphabet, only suggesting a possible influence on the Armenian one. --Vitilsky (talk) 12:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

So in essence you are also wrong. The Ethiopian alphabet does not date to the ca. 1860. Where did you take that information from? --Vitilsky (talk) 12:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Most Ethiopians would be quite amused to hear that their script dates from 1860, I think... The things you read on "the Truth according to Wikipedia" these days! Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 13:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Should we keep all references, and just add Amharic next to the "possible influences" section? I suggest we could keep the status quo in the article by doing that. Also, sorry if I came across bluntly before. I guess I was exaggerating when I said that about the Greek alphabet, when it could have influenced the order of the letters. In my opinion, I note, they all share an influence, a bigger or smaller influence could be debated. --Vitilsky (talk) 13:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

It may be confusing to call it "Amharic", since Amharic is actually a modern language that uses the ancient Ge'ez script. It would be like arguing that the "English alphabet" did not exist until 1500, the approximate date of its last fine-tuning modifications, when it in fact really basically uses the far older Latin alphabet. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 13:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

In this case, Geez script? --Vitilsky (talk) 13:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, because the sources say "Ge'ez script", or "Ethiopic script" which is the same thing, they don't actually say "Amharic script". Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 13:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I left it on Ethiopic script. Will subsequently add any more sources I find. --Vitilsky (talk) 14:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

There is no Amharic script. The Amharic alphabet uses the Ethiopic script. Saying Armenian is based on Amharic would be like saying French is based on English, when by "English" you meant Latin. Amharic has letters that Ge'ez did not have, just as English has letters that Latin did not have. — kwami (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I find the Ethiopic origin claim an extreme afrocentric POV. The claim was first made by the africanist Dmitri Olderogge. In Olderogge's theory, Daniel, a Syriac bishop invents Armenian inspired by Ge'ez. Now all we know of Daniel comes from the Armenian legend of the invention of the alphabet, and that story says nothing of his knowledge of Ethiopic or why he would choose a script used by people living 3000km from his native Mesopotamia instead of his native Syriac. On the other hand Vrej Nersessian an actual expert on Armenian Alphabet mentions no such connection in his lengthy discussion on the origin of the alphabet. Another reference suggests that 20 letters from Mesrop's alphabet came from Greek, 4 from Syriac, and 12 were modelled after Greek.--Kathovo talk 15:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I agree with you. The theory of Ethiopean influence is based exclusively on the similarity of some letters (with different sounds). There have been a lot of reasons given for those similarities. And there are some other scripts which are also "as similar" to Armenian, as Ethiopic. I wonder if any expert of Armenian studies takes this view serious. Хаченци (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Kathovo, if you know about the origin of the Ethiopic theory, maybe you can help the article to better attribute it to its source (Olderogge?) and hopefully also add mention of Nersessian's and other views. Thanks, Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 23:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

The similarity between Armenian and Geez scripts was first mentioned by an Armenian scholar (I forgot the name, but I can find it). But he talked only about similarity, no word about possible Ethiopean origin of Armenian alphabet. Olderogge was the first scholar to create a theory concerning Ethiopean influence on Armenian alphabet. The article of Olderogge is available in internet in Russian. Хаченци (talk) 02:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

There should be no mention of the Ethiopian script in this article period, it's a completely unrelated script with a different parent system.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 12:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with you. It's a theory, it can be sourced to its origin, the fact that you personally disagree with it or don't like it is no reason to prevent readers from learning it exists. Up until now we've been talking about attributing the theory, but you've just taken it to a whole new level by suggesting suppression, not attributation. So, no. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 14:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

There is no such theory, fringe pseudoscience that is rejected by academic consensus is irrelevant. You cannot find a single peer reviewed academic source that suggests a link between Armenian and Ethiopian because it does not exist. I say peer reviewed because for such an extraordinary claim the source must also be extraordinary. -- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 14:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

"Fringe pseudoscience" aside from rhetoric would be your personal point of view, you are clearly opinionated on this and exxpect everyone else not only to share your opinion, but cannot suffer anyone else's opinion to be mentioned in the article. Clearly you are going to run into resistance on this, because we don't just reflect your point of view, that's why NPOV is one of our core policies. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Ethiopian link is a fringe theory. I doubt it should be mentioned. Zimmarod (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Once again, "fringe theory" is a point-of-view characterization being made by wikipedian contributors who feel themselves competent to judge the scholarly sources speaking for this school of thought to the point where they don't think readers need to "know" about the existence of it. But on wikipedia, we have a cornerstone policy known as NPOV. We also don't label something we don't like or agree with as "fringe" and censor it. Even if you had reliable sources calling it "fringe", which you don't, it would still be encyclopedic as a published school of thought. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 19:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Eurpator is right (see above): "You cannot find a single peer reviewed academic source that suggests a link between Armenian and Ethiopian." I personally see some similarity but I also see similarity between Armenian and Tamil alphabet. Sprutt (talk) 15:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I can't remember any scholar of Armenian studies mentioning this. This is just another theory, which has been published (by a scholar of African studies), but was not accepted. It's absolutely not neccessary to include such theories.Хаченци (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I call BIAS, because we already have an academic source for the Ethiopian theory (Olderogge), we have Olderogge's academic peers who are peer reviewing Olderogge, then we have wikipedian editors on this talk page saying "That doesn't count as our special definition of "academic" or "peer reviewed", because WE DON'T LIKE IT, therefore readers may not be informed of this, says us." Guess it will have to go higher up to prevent scholarly information being suppressed. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:16, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Look, there are academic sources for almost any claim. If we go back to 18-19th century, when there were already well known academics, univeristies and extraordinary scholars, we may find completely different opinions. The question is weather the theory of Olderogge was supported by the experts (in this case experts of Armenian alphabet), or not. I can't see any scholar of Armenian studies, who supports this view. If you know such sources, inform us. If not, that theory has nothing to do in the article. Хаченци (talk) 21:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

NPOV policy means all points of view should be mentionable in the article, not selectively the ones that meet your litmus test of approval for "expertise". Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 22:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

NPOV refers mainly to disputable topics. This one is not disputable. We can write a text like "It has been proposed that Armenian alphabet was influenced by Ethiopean alphabet, but this view is rejected by modern scholars.". And then the reader will think - hmmmm, why do they write it at all? I mean, if there would be Armenian scholars, who claim Ethiopic script originated in Armenia, should we mention them also in the article about Ge'ez script? I don't think so. Olderogge and Pankhurst are perfect africanists and ethiopists, but they are not authorities of Armenian studis, and hence, not a reliable source for this article. NPOV has nothing to do with it. If you find a scholar of Armenian studies claiming Ge'ez has influenced Armenian alphabet, the text will remain. If not, it must be deleted. Хаченци (talk) 22:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I totally agree with Khachentsi. If this was a legitimate issue, it would have been addressed by at least a few historians or linguists who are experts on Armenian studies. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Requesting Archaeological proof that Armenian alphabet was created in 405 or 406 AD

On Georgian alphabet article, people requested archeological proof when we brought source which said it was created in 3th century B.C. but as here is no archeological proof of it, its wrote that its made in Vth century as we have earliest script from this time. But on Armenian alphabet article, here is everything basing on one work and no archeological proof brought here it is made in 405 or 406 AD. I request for earliest Armenian script archeologically dated as 405-6 year, agreed by scholars internationally or I request to fix its date of creation to the earliest found script. --Obitauri (talk) 12:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

If you do this, it would be nothing else but vandalism.Хаченци (talk) 19:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

405-6 AD for Armenian alphabet is fixed in primary sources describing the invention of the alphabet. There is no archaeological proof that Georgian alphabet was created at any time earlier than 5 c. AD. Sprutt (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Please bring sources and discuss. Try to achieve consensus. Britannica says:

"Armenian alphabet, script developed for the Armenian language in the 5th century ad and still in use. It was probably derived from the Pahlavi alphabet of Persia, with some Greek influences. According to local tradition, the Armenian alphabet was invented in 405 by Mesrop Mashtots, aided by Isaac (Sahak) the Great, supreme head of the Armenian Apostolic Church, and by a Greek called Rufanos. Isaac founded a school of translators and had the Bible translated into Armenian in the new script. The oldest surviving documents in Armenian date from the 9th to 10th century ad." Source: Britannica

According to Britannica, alphabet was created in 5th century, but oldest surviving archaeological proof is found and is dated between 9-10th century. Britannica also says, that creation of Alphabet by Armenian scholar Mesrop Mashtots, is according to Armenian traditions. Article now says date of creation as 405-6 AD. We can write, that oldest surviving script is from 9-10th century AD, but we can also include Armenian traditional point of view on date. We must discuss to achieve consensus. --Volksjäger162 (talk) 13:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Stop opening new accounts and talking absurd. Read the academical sources. Хаченци (talk) 14:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

I am new user to Wikipedia and no one talks absurd here. If you think I am sockpuppet or duplicate account, I can ask you for proof, if proof is that I talk against your point of view, your argument becomes absurd and not my. I told you to discuss this. Wikipedia is not place for calling absurd to something without evidence. Source brought by me. Discuss this and achieve consensus --Volksjäger162 (talk) 14:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Note: - If you suspect someone of being a sockpuppet please make a report here (WP:SPI) providing as much evidence as you can and the matter will then be investigated by an administrator. KiraChinmoku _{(T, ¤)} 14:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

This user keeps undoing edit with no reason and removes "Citation needed". I am not going to start edit war here. I will take this to Administrator Notice board --Volksjäger162 (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

I am not undoing edit with no reason, I am undoing an edit, which has nothing to do with the article. Requesting sources is not something you can do on every word. There are enough sources given. And if you read at least a little bit about the subject, you would not do such edits. Read at least some of the literature given in references. Хаченци (talk) 14:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Britannica suggests, that oldest script found, which is wrote in Armenian dates back to 9-10th century. It also suggests, that Armenian traditional view suggests date of 406th century. Which is more important, traditional point and support of it or archaeological proof? For me both are important but I prefer proof. I can suggest to mention both dates of creation or just discuss and decide which is more reliable. It will be better if we write both dates like:

406-407 AD according to Armenian traditional view, 9-10th century as of oldest script date. --Volksjäger162 (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

The oldest known example (but now destroyed) of the use of the alphabet in Armenia was from the late 5th-century, an inscription on the 5th-century basilica church at Tekor. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 03:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

---

Armenian alphabet → Armenian script – This article is about more than just the alphabet, it covers the entire script. The alphabet is just one section of the article. Relisted. BDD (talk) 00:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC) — kwami (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose Since the Armenian script is only used for writing Armenian why do we need an article titled "Armenian script"? What I mean is that for example the Arabic script (the writing system) is used for writing several languages and each language has a separate article for their variation of the script (e.g. Persian alphabet). This makes sense. The Armenian alphabet and the Armenian script are the same thing. Please correct me if I'm wrong. --Երևանցի ^talk 01:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

• Why? The non-alphabetic aspects of the article (which I assume are the numbers and punctuation) are ancillary. —  AjaxSmack  03:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Actually, it has been used for other languages, such as Turkish, though I don't know if separate alphabets were established. I'm not arguing hard for a move. It makes sense to me, but I don't think it's a big deal either way, since we're not likely to have separate articles any time soon. — kwami (talk) 03:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

• Support. The proposer makes a good case, and none of the discussion above challenges it in any way. Andrewa (talk) 05:52, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose. The Armenian script is used for the Armenian language alone. Alphabet is a far more common description rather than the vaguely termed Armenian script that just creates more confusion. werldwayd (talk) 22:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Total BS Part II

Another "fringe pseudo" article for you, so-called Wikischolars

http://blogs.library.ucla.edu/digitallibraryprogram/2011/06/24/armenian-and-ethiopic-manuscripts/&sa=U&ei=JE9oU_v_L8rs0gXB8oGQBw&ved=0CB0QFjAA&usg=AFQjCNHS-rpcneO9Zh6juoJ6JmWsL_R23g

Read this. How can it be possible that they're so similar yet you say "it comes from Greek" NO IT DOES NOT EVEN LOOK SIMILAR, JUST THE LETTER ORDER IS SIMILAR (apart from the letter Eta). The Armenian alphabet at least may have a connection to the Ge'ez script. What, you hate to admit the alphabet may relate to South Arabian culture? --Vitilsky (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Verjaket or vertsaket

Hi,

The full stop is called "verjaket" here. In Unicode it's called "vertsaket". For an example see http://www.unicode.org/charts/beta/nameslist/n_0530.html .

Is there a preferred name? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

History and development

The "History and development" section talks about "principal calligraphic hands" - Erkatagir, Bolorgir, Notrgir, and Sheghagir. A chart comparing the letter forms to the printed and written letter forms would be useful here. Are there any sources for such a chart? Alternative, does anyone have the resources to create such a chart? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.0.15.171 (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Ridiculous Georgian Propaganda

I see that Georgian butt-hurt wiki"scholars" have decided that not only will they lie on their own page, but also must do it on the Armenian alphabet page to be "consistent". Which one of you morons is it? I have not investigated this yet but I will find out later and expose you. For now I will just start this section to identify your VANDALISM. In particular I am talking about this passage: "most scholars link the creation of the Georgian script to the process of Christianization of Iberia, a core Georgian kingdom of Kartli. The alphabet was therefore most probably created between the conversion of Iberia under King Mirian III (326 or 337) and the Bir el Qutt inscriptions of 430,[8] contemporaneously with the Armenian alphabet." Seriously Morons? Firstly Georgian has NOTHING to do with the creation of the Armenian Alphabet, but the reverse is NOT true, the Georgian alphabet is derived from the Armenian. Why? Very simple: Georgian writing does not exist until AFTER Mashtots invented it. I suppose we should congratulate you butt-hurt Georgians for managing to come up with a "politically correct" form of saying "Mashtots the Armenian did not create the Georgian alphabet because this hurts our national pride". And who are these "most scholars" by the way? The unknown Hewitt writing about "Georgian alphabet" in the 21st century and Barbara A. West - SAYING NOTHING when stating "Georgian existed in fifth century" no duh. Is that supposed to be your "proof"? A bunch of ridiculous people. There used to be numerous sources, including non-Armenian ones which clearly stated that the Georgian alphabet was invented by Mashtots and therefore derived from Armenian. You can't deal with this and it is causing you depression? Tough luck. This information WILL be back here and you disruptive vandalism WILL be dealt with. Note: this same section is now going on the Georgian page as well. 2602:306:3077:A580:517E:F559:4B7D:6CFC (talk) 23:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Note 1 Has a Flaw

In Note 1, below the alphabet table, there seems to be a lack of clarity on whether or not the note refers to something as applying to all three categories, or as only applying to one of the three categories, which are "used in classical orthography", "used word-initially", and "used in some compounds words". This led to some confusion for me when looking at the letter "յ". Looking at the pronunciation column of the letter "յ", you'll see two possible pronunciations in the "Eastern" part of the pronunciation column. The endnote next to /h/ there implies that it doesn't belong in the "Eastern" part, due to the note possibly making the "/h/" apply to "Only used in classical orthography."

If the true meaning is that all three categories apply, words should be added to the note.

If the true meaning is that only one or two of the categories apply, the note should be split into three notes.

I only hesitate to do any of this myself as I'm sincerely confused about the meaning.--Ντόναλντ (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Conflicting info on ISO 9985

Two places on this page (the big table Armenian_alphabet#Alphabet and the smaller table Armenian_alphabet#Transliteration), and one place on a different page (Romanization_of_Armenian#Transliteration_tables) list the ISO 9985 transliteration of each Armenian letter. But these places don't agree. I noticed that these letters: (ղ ռ ր ո ու) do not have the same transliteration given in all three places, and there may be other such letters. Can someone verify what is actually correct according to ISO 9985? (To be clear, I am only talking about ISO 9985, not the other romanization systems.) Damangio (talk) 04:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Ethiopian alphabet

There are exact same letters in both Armenian and Ethiopian alphabets but they have different pronunciations. How did it happen? LeticiaLL (talk) 16:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey bro just one question

just wondering, how is Latin a sister language of Armenian? :0 2600:6C50:B00:6201:E90A:C775:33A1:77E2 (talk) 07:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

citation for /ɹ/

The table states that Classical ր is /ɹ/, but what's a citation for that? Macak (2017, "The phonology of Classical Armenian", page 1042) states that it's /ɾ/ Hovsepig (talk) 01:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Alternate forms

The Wiktionary page for Հ has the image below, which shows variations of Հ.

Three different glyph shapes of the Armenian capital letter ho

I think the present article page should mention that. Also, I have checked all the Wiktionary pages for the Armenian letters, and it’s the only one that shows glyph variations. Is it indeed the only letter which has variations? Some background would be interesting.

CielProfond (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 8 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

---

Armenian alphabet → Armenian script – This article encompasses more than just the alphabet; it covers the entire script. The alphabet is merely one part of it. I noticed that a move was already requested. Previously, the main argument against this was that the Armenian script is used exclusively for the Armenian language. However, similar articles about native Caucasian scripts are titled Caucasian Albanian script and Georgian scripts, even though they are predominantly used for a single language as well. Moreover, the Armenian script has occasionally been used for other languages, as exemplified by the Armeno-Turkish alphabet and the relevant section in this article. Therefore, to ensure consistency, I propose the move. Aldij (talk) 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 17:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Writing systems and WikiProject Armenia have been notified of this discussion. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 13:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relist to generate more participation - please see the 2014 RM above with the same target title, hopefully this time we can find a consensus ASUKITE 17:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Oppose. "Armenian alphabet" is by far more commonly used than the ambiguous expression "Armenian script". It's also the topic name in reliable sources such as Britannica, etc. Also note that Georgian scripts actually speaks against this move, as "script" is used here for the 3 stylistic variants ("three writing systems of the Georgian alphabet"Unesco) not as a synonym for "alphabet" or "writing system". Serg!o (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.