Talk:Association Forum of Chicagoland

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

We can move the contents of this article into the Association Forum and make it more notable. Chris 15:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 August 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: NO CONSENSUS (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Association Forum of Chicagoland → Association Forum – According to the entity's website, they have changed their name to just Association Forum. Judging from the comment above, this happened over ten years ago. Speciate (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

forget about moving this page there's nothing there for over a decade it should be deleted עם ישראל חי (talk) 14:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the organization is defunct, it can still have a Wikipedia article as long as it was once notable. Speciate (talk) 16:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. No case for deletion. Andrewa (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Proposed article title is far too generic, see https://rheumatology.org.au/forum/index.php?p=/discussions for just one example. This may not be the best name for the article, but the official name counts for little under the article title policy (the essay says this more succinctly, but it's what the policy says too). Andrewa (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.