Talk:Athir al-Din Akhsikati
Appearance
Athir al-Din Akhsikati has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 24, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Athir al-Din Akhsikati/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 16:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
The image is appropriately tagged; sources are reliable.
"he wrote various didactics": does the source use "didactic" as a noun? Does this refer to a poetic form?- Ops, the source says "didactic" as well, fixed it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
How can it be simultaneously true that his work is "highly esteemed in scholarship" but "overlooked by scholars"? And that he has "only received little attention in scholarship"? Seems like perhaps a conflict between the western and Persian sources?- Ops, seems like I misread the source. He was highly esteemed amongst figures around his own time period, not present-day. Slightly changed it [1], will change it more in a bit. EDIT: Did a bit more adjusting, thoughts? --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- "Athir al-Din is well-known for his rhetoric skills, especially when it was a figure of speech": what does this mean? "Figure of speech" is a pretty general term.
- Unfortunately the source simply says "figure of speech" ("Athīr al-Dīn stands out for his rhetorical ability, particularly in the construction of figures of speech."). I've altered it a bit to match the source more, thoughts? [2] --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- It's a bit vague. I think I would just cut it. If you'd rather keep it, perhaps make it a direct quote? And given that we've said he's neglected by modern scholars, I think we need to say in what sense he is "well-known for his rhetorical skills" -- "scholars who have studied his work praise his rhetorical skills", perhaps? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the source simply says "figure of speech" ("Athīr al-Dīn stands out for his rhetorical ability, particularly in the construction of figures of speech."). I've altered it a bit to match the source more, thoughts? [2] --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- I see. Thoughts on this? [3] --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
There were a few infelicities in the prose but it was easier to fix them myself. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Now looks good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Iran articles
- Unknown-importance Iran articles
- WikiProject Iran articles
- GA-Class Literature articles
- Unknown-importance Literature articles
- GA-Class Poetry articles
- Unknown-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles