This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Adding text to "History" section found in previous IP edit. Removed some buzz words, but overall sourced factual content. Jppcap (talk) 00:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Removed multiple buzz from previous IP edit of lede, but overall factual content. Jppcap (talk) 00:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Removed multiple buzz words/excess from previous IP edit of "Brand development", section expanded per previous edit sourcing of facts. Removing tags as page is clean of promo. Jppcap (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[Joelle] sits on the edge of the bed and crosses her legs, supporting one huarache’s heel on the railing’s joint, revealing she’s got on white socks under flesh-colored huaraches and ancient baggy old birch-colored sweatpants with B.U.M. down one leg, which Gately’s pretty sure he’s seen at the Sunday a.m. Big Book meeting on Ken Erdedy, and belong to Erdedy, and he feels a flash of something unpleasant that she’d be wearing the upscale kid’s pants.
Is there really no reliable information available about how they came to choose such a ridiculous brand name? It's always bugged me. Bad enough in the U.S., worse in the U.K. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.193.137.83 (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]