Talk:Bardanes Tourkos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBardanes Tourkos has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 18, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 12, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 4, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that before beginning his revolt in 803, Bardanes Tourkos, with his three principal associates, Thomas, Leo the Armenian and Michael the Amorian, allegedly visited a monk who foretold their fates?]
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bardanes Tourkos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All up this is very good and I'm pretty well ready to list as GA. Very nicely written, paticularly given the lack of certainty on so many aspects of his life -- you handle that well IMO. A few things before closing/promoting...

  • I'm guessing you'd have done it if you felt at all confident about it but I have to ask: can we not put approximate life dates in for this chap? We seem to be able to do that for a number of his contemporaries which, especially in the lead section, makes the fact we don't do it for the subject of the article himself stand out even more.
  • I think probably identify W. Treadgold as "historian" or whatever he is -- use his first name as well...
  • Not an absolute requirement, but you could add alt text for the images. I think they could afford to be a bit bigger as well, say 280-300px.

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! First off, thanks for taking the time for the review. On the issues you raised, unfortunately neither the date of his birth nor that of his death are known, or any details whatsoever about his early life. We could speculate, but it would be merely guesswork. I added a "floruit" in the lede, just in case, but that's about it. Did Treadgold as suggested, added alt text and fixed some minor typo errors. If you have any further suggestions as to the text itself, i.e. if there is any place where it should be made clearer or more context provided, please do tell. Cheers, Constantine 13:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's all fine, the floruit is a good solution for the lead -- happy to pass this as GA, well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Bardanes Tourkos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]