Talk:Battle of Arawe/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 11:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

Its looking really good.

No diasamb links needing attention

The tool checked and external links are all ok

Suggestion only consider writing numbers under 100 in full, I believe it reads better when using numbers to identify equipment - 56 A6M5 Zero fighters evaded the USAAF combat air patrol (CAP) of 16 P-38 Lightnings. - fifty-six A6M5 Zeros and sixteen P-38 etc

I think that the normal convention is to use numbers for everything over about ten except for where it looks silly or is confusing. I think that I'll leave the numbers as-is here.

U.S. Navy and U.S. Army are easy to understand but USAAF RAAF USMC APDs LCTs LCMs need to be linked

Done

In the landings section in the mid afternoon of Z-Day but there is no prior explanation of what Z-Day is

Removed

Citation 64 needs an access date

Added

In the bibliography some publications are linked to on line sites, where the book is available on line. However

Drea, Edward J. is a dead link

Fixed

Rottman, Gordon (2002). World War II Pacific Island Guide. A Geo-Military Study is the only one linked to Google books

Link removed.

Only some of them have access dates

All added

Barbey, Daniel E. (1969) could have the OCLC number added I presume it was published before ISBNs were issued

OCLCs added for all books without ISBNs.

On hold

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I think that I've now addressed all those comments. Thanks for the review Jim. Nick-D (talk) 07:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)