Talk:Battle of Goychay/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 10:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Battle of Goychay (Azerbaijani: Göyçay döyüşü, Russian: Геокчайский бой, Turkish: Göyçay/Gökçay Savaşı) or Raid on Goychay (Azerbaijani: Göyçay basqını, Turkish: Göyçay/Gökçay Baskını) Unlink both Russian and Turkish languages.
  • operation to prevent the Ottoman army from recovering in Ganja --> "operation to prevent the Ottoman Army from recovering in Ganja" Pipe Ottoman Army to the Ottoman Army (1861–1922).
  • Red Army is overlinked.
  • but Mustafa Görüryılmaz notes that in reality Is there a link for Mustafa Görüryılmaz?
  • fight against the Ottoman-Azerbaijani coalition forces Unlink Azerbaijani.
  • led by Osman Bey, was sent to the Garamaryam front Link of Osman Bey?
  • Islamic Army of the Caucasus in Myusyuslyu, Nazım Bey Link Nazım Bey?
  • the 28th Battalion was caught in a Soviet ambush having failed to take timely measures --> "the 28th Battalion were caught in a Soviet ambush having failed to take timely measures"
  • The 29th Battalion, which was attacked from both sides, was able to move to the village of Veysalli after a very bloody fight --> "The 29th Battalion, were attacked from both sides, were able to move to the village of Veysalli after a very bloody fight"
  • neither side was able to defeat the other in the hot summer weather --> "neither side were able to defeat the other in the hot summer weather"
  • the double envelopment maneuver used by the Ottoman army in such battles was not applied --> "the double envelopment manoeuvre used by the Ottoman Army in such battles were not applied"
  • According to reports, Bolshevik Red Army forces had burned down American burned.
  • were able to recruit Armenians and Russians from surrounding Unlink Russians because of common term.
  • the Islamic army of the Caucasus after its formation --> "the Islamic Army of the Caucasus after their formation"
  • disappointment to the public in a speech given in the town center American center.
  • the 5th Caucasus Infantry Division was preparing for its first combined operation in Azerbaijan --> "the 5th Caucasus Infantry Division were preparing for their first combined operation in Azerbaijan" and unlink Azerbaijan.
  • while the 2nd Cavalry Regiment was going to attack the Bolsheviks --> "while the 2nd Cavalry Regiment were going to attack the Bolsheviks"
  • of about a thousand troops, two cannons and two machine guns American plural form of cannon.
  • but were fully defeated by 7:00 AM --> "but were fully defeated by 7:00 am"
  • The 9th Caucasian Regiment, which was stationed in Poylu --> "The 9th Caucasian Regiment, were stationed in Poylu"
  • which consisted of less than 10 thousand soldiers --> "which consisted of less than ten thousand soldiers" in the note.
  • The coalition force seized the Syghyr Station on 10 June Change force to forces.
  • advantage of this situation, which was favorable to the Baku commissioner American favorable.

Infobox

  • "27 June – 1 July 1918 (4 days)" Place the days below the date.
  • "35,000 (including Dashnak groups)" Same as above try to make "(including Dashnak groups)" below the strength.
  • Who's the later of the Soviet Russians?

Images

  • Why is File:Battle of Goychay plan.jpg in PD? The date part of the images means the original date.
  • File:Ottoman soldier in Azerbaijan.png Same as above. BTW if the author is unknown how do we know it is in PD in the US?
  • File:Azeri army soldiers.jpg There should be a US tag same with the other images if they are in PD.
  • Try to avoid. If you click on the images File:Rushdi Pasha.jpg and File:Stepan Shaumyan.jpg then you'll go to their articles.
  • Also try to have links to the sources in images who're in PD.

Sources

  • Ref 1, translate the title.
  • Birinci Dünya hərbində Türk hərbi, Qafqaz cəbhəsi, III ordu hərəkatı is it a book? If it then place it to the "Sources" section also why doesn't it have no link or book code?
  • Ref 7 has no link.
  • Ref 18 needs a translated title.
  • Süleymanov's source needs an access-date. And translate its title. Same with all foreign languages in the "Source" section.
  • Remove David Allen, William Edward; Muratoff, Paul's book's link and the archive because we only need the book code and a Google Books' URL if they give us a preview.
  • "Göyçay və Cavad qəzalarında erməni vəhşilikləri"'s link is dead.

That's anything I think there is a hope of work in the sources and the images but I think it can pass it these comments are addressed. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Text

  • Green tickY Removed both links. All languages were shown with templates, so I removed the templates too.
  • Green tickY Fixed. Changed naming and the link.
  • Green tickY Fixed. Left only one link to the Red Army.
  • Question? You mean a Wikipedia article? No, there is no Wikipedia article of Görüryılmaz. There is a page dedicated to him in kitapyurdu and biyografi. He seems encyclopedic enough, I actually can create an article about him.
  • Green tickY Fixed. I was confused when writing this article. I really didn't knew who could Osman Bey could be. I linked him with Topal Osman. He fought in Caucasus and was a Yarbay, just like the Osman Bey in the article. It seems like he is referred to as Osman Bey in some sources.
  • Red XN There is no Wikipedia article for Nazım Bey. His full name is . There are articles about him in University of Ankara and DergiPark.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Red XN Changed it to Russians in Azerbaijan.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.

Infobox

  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Nota bene* Russian SFSR and Baku Commune were different things. The latter was independent of Russian SFSR, its close ally.
  • @Solavirum: I'm sorry for the confusion but I meant "who's the leader of the Soviet Russian forces?". Sorry for the confusion. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CPA-5:, I added Sergey Kirov for now, per my history teacher, but I will research it deeper and try to find a better variant. Cheers. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 16:37, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images

  • Nota bene* It is a battle plan, drawn during the battle (1918). The PD date is January 1, 1924 in US.
  • Nota bene* It's author is unknown. The image was published in a state-sponsored encyclopedia. The image itself was most likely in the state archives.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed. Removed links.
  • Green tickY Fixed. Added links.

Sources

  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed. I actually had such a hard time finding this book.
  •  On hold I don't think I'd be able to find this that easily. I don't even think a URL exist for it. It was published in 1990, Azerbaijan wasn't even independent back then. There is no special link for it. A mention of issue of "tarix, fəlsəfə, hüquq seriyası" published in 1990 exists in here. It clearly exists, but not in the web. I might need to dig in on this topic IRL. But I don't even know if they would even let me in due to my age.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
  • Green tickY Fixed.
@CPA-5:, took a bit of a time, but I finally ended my work on the issues you addressed. Hope it's okay. Cheers bud! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 11:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CPA-5 and Solavirum:. Hi how are we going with this. AIRcorn (talk) 07:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Aircorn:, hello there! Well, nearly everything is done, except for this one (I don't think I'd be able to find this that easily. I don't even think a URL exist for it. It was published in 1990, Azerbaijan wasn't even independent back then. There is no special link for it. A mention of issue of "tarix, fəlsəfə, hüquq seriyası" published in 1990 exists in here. It clearly exists, but not in the web. I might need to dig in on this topic IRL. But I don't even know if they would even let me in due to my age.). I will try to get this done this week. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 12:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Solavirum. Good to hear. CPA has a few outstanding lagging reviews and I have left a personal message at their talk page seeing how they are going with these. If they don't get back to this one and you think it is right give me a ping and I can have a look for you. AIRcorn (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Aircorn: and @CPA-5:, I deleted the ref in question, as I could not get access to the library. This was it, I think we can conclude this. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 15:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Aircorn: and @CPA-5:, actually forget that. My acquaintance was able to get the actual copy, and I converted it into PDF. Everything is done! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 14:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Solavirum: Aha that sounds good to hear now I believe the title needs to be translated and maybe a "|language=" template here. It looks like it is written in Cyrillic but in which language if I can ask you that question? I hope we finally can promote it before New Year. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CPA-5:, Green tickY done. It is in Azerbaijani, which used Cyrillic alphabet from 1938 to 1991. Cheers! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 15:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • All right now we finaly can promote it and a happy New Year. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]