Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Ituzaingó

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class.

size of the armies

[edit]

the exact number is unknown,there is only approximate data and all give above 5.000 for the brazilians —Preceding unsigned comment added by PedroTaber (talkcontribs) 22:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo Barroso, in his "Historia mIlitar do Brasil"gives the number of only 3000 troops for the brazilian side - which makes much more sense if you consider that it was a invasion force against the whole of the local forces plus argentinian forces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.4.54.219 (talk) 21:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, of only 6200 troops against 9000  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.4.54.219 (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply] 
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Ituzaingó. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]