Talk:BeautifulPeople.com
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BeautifulPeople.com article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
[edit]This entire article is unintelligible and I'm fairly certain it's been vandalized in places. Le Douche? But of course! (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hoax
[edit]From January 4, 2010 until today [1] a hoax [2] was presented as truth [3]. Secdio (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Article Quality
[edit]This article is terrible and it reads like an advertisement in some places. I've made a few changes but it still needs a good deal of work. I Feel Tired (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class Websites articles
- Unknown-importance Websites articles
- Start-Class Websites articles of Unknown-importance
- All Websites articles
- Websites articles needing images
- Computing articles needing images
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Wikipedia requested images of business & economic topics