Talk:Berar Sultanate

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

On 5 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Berar Sultanate to Imad Shahi dynasty. The result of the discussion was moved.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berar Sultanate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629153707/http://www.hostkingdom.net:80/india.html to http://www.hostkingdom.net/india.html#Berar

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 15:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Berar Sultanate → Imad Shahi dynasty – Berar Sultanate is more likely a fabricated PoV name, even Ngram is not available for Berar Sultanate [1]. Commonname per reliable publishers, and more appropriate to name for a Dynasty. Imperial ^[AFCND] 13:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Toadette^Edit! 15:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Maharashtra, Noticeboard for India-related topics, and WikiProject Former countries have been notified of this discussion. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Adil Shahi dynasty which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 July 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Berar Sultanate be renamed and moved to Berar sultanate.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Berar Sultanate → Berar sultanate – Capitalization is not necessary. When I search for "Berar Sultanate" on Google Books, I find 6 of the first 10 hits user lowercase sultanate. Per the criteria at MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS, we should not cap things that are not mostly capped in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 06:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note – "Imad Shahi sultanate" also most commonly uses lowercase sultanate. Dicklyon (talk) 06:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon, WP:NCCAPS doesn't apply here as it is a proper noun in this case. Also, "Berar Sultanate" is WP:CONSISTENT with other similarly named articles. PadFoot (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NCCAPS says "For multiword page titles, one should leave the second and subsequent words in lowercase unless the title phrase is a proper name that would always occur capitalized, even mid-sentence." (my bold). It applies. And yes, now that you point it out, there are many others with the same problem. I'll do a multi-RM next, whether this one passes or not. Dicklyon (talk) 14:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Padfoot's reasoning. This is a proper noun, and every single former country that I know of with Sultanate in the name has the "S" capitalized, whether some sources don't or not. This is a consistency issue, not entirely a what-sources-say issue. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose capitalisation is consistent with other articles Kowal2701 (talk) 12:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]