User talk:PadFoot2008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhundari language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marwari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Northwest India
added links pointing to Demetrius I, Pala dynasty, AJK and Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tagore family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noble.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A small help[edit]

Could you please review the article on the Gupta-Saka War? It is mentioned in a source (though I'm unsure of its reliability) that the Guptas captured Sindh from the Sakas. However, during the same period, the Sassanids, followed by the Rai dynasty, were ruling over Sindh. DeepstoneV (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DeepstoneV, I am not sure but as far as I am aware, the Magadhan Empire under the Gupta dynasty never directly ruled western states (like Malwa for instance). The western parts of the Magadhan Empire were vassals ruled by their own dynasties. The House of Aulikara ruled the Kingdom of Malwa as vassals of Kumaragupta of the Magadhan Empire for some time, so perhaps, the Rai dynasty might have ruled Sindh as vassals of the Magadhan Empire under Guptas for a period the same way but then could have come under Persian influence later on or earlier. Ancient history is usually pretty ambiguous in these cases. PadFoot2008 (talk) 01:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use British English tag[edit]

Hi PadFoot2008, just wondering why you added the Use British English tag to Breakup of Spanish armed forces (1936) and changed the spelling within the article? This violates MOS:RETAIN which states "With few exceptions (e.g., when a topic has strong national ties or the change reduces ambiguity), there is no valid reason for changing from one acceptable option to another." AusLondonder (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]