This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
I object to the recent changes by User:Garamond Lethe to the article on the ground that, they give undue weight to one side of the conflict, thus going against the basic policy WP:NPOV. --Universal Life (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that doesn't give me a whole lot to work with. What independent, reliable sources am I not giving sufficient weight to? GaramondLethe 16:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can't improve the article if you don't tell me what you think is wrong with it. I've removed the NPOV tags. I'm happy to discuss this with you when you're ready. GaramondLethe 04:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Universal Life, if you don't identify why those sections aren't neutral then the tags are just going to come off again. I've made a good-faith effort at improving the article, adding a few more newspaper citations and removing the unsubstantiated accusations in the lead. Did that resolve the problem? If not, what is the problem? Garamond Lethet c 08:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, we have guidance about just this situation. From template:POV:
Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag should first discuss concerns on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, and should add this tag only as a last resort. In the absence of such a discussion, or where it remains unclear what the NPOV violation is, the tag may be removed by any editor.
I will be removing the tags in hopes of beginning a discussion here. Garamond Lethet c 08:36, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on Bijon Setu massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Hi everyone. First of all I'm not a lawyer and I don't usually use words such as "slander". However, the sentences I've read in the section such as Sil describes how members of Ananda Marga had engaged in many acts of violence (including murders of members leaving the group) does slander Ananda Marga, a world-wide socio-spiritual organisation which propagates the philosophy of ethics at its core and ahimsa (non-violence) as a part of that philosophy. The Explanation section creates the false image that Ananda Marga members are murderers and/or violent and/or may be child-kidnappers, of which there are no reliable source, therefore it is defamatory (WP:Libel). The fact that all its philosophy and humanitarian activities (from yoga to disaster relief) I've read so-far, all the praise they've got from leaders and organisations world-wide and all the positive feedback published directly by NGOs (such as UNICEF) that they work together shows just the contrary.
The section also reflects the viewpoints of just one side creating a WP:POV article with WP:UNDUE weight. The quotations and wording seem to be used out of context and seem to almost legitimise to murder of 17 human beings. Therefore, could someone either rewrite the whole section, remove it or at least remove the libellous sounding sentences from the section? Thank you. Universal Life (talk) 20:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, the way the section is written and quoted with an undue weight, seems only to benefit a political party interests and perhaps to whitewash them. --Universal Life (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
