Talk:Bill Evans Trio with Symphony Orchestra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reviews[edit]

This album was never well received because typically for Bill Evans and Claus Ogerman, they were ahead of their time. It's always easy for columnists such as Yanow to be dismissive if they don't like something. Fortunately there are more positive reviews around.

This album wasn't really 3rd Stream such as other collaborations Evans participated in (and he was first choice keyboards for many composers). Even today attempting to introduce more sophisticated levels of musical understanding/ appreciation to a culture awash wish simplistic pop music, is just difficult.

This is one of my favourite Evans albums, maybe because it was the first time I ever heard Evans at the piano. The complex arrangements of piano combined with Ogermans lush orchestrations could easily fool people into thinking this was just 'elevator music'. A mix of original compositions and classical compositions the session was a beautiful one. Evans was a master at every genre and this is no exception. I would suggest Scott Yanow concentrate on writing - some of his work is quite passable!

There - got that off my chest - probably no-one else cares. Patrick --Jppigott (talk) 01:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. But it isn't allowed to copy text like from Amazon. You need to write it in your own words or quote a source or something on that order. Maybe find a positive review that can be quoted and referenced properly. I'll look around for one too. Yes, critics can be tough and we can disagree with them. Best to you. Airproofing (talk) 03:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great news, Patrick. I found a nice one at AllAboutJazz. I'll post it. Airproofing (talk) 03:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Evans Trio with Symphony Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]