This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
WP:VG article reassessment (20 September 2023)[edit]
This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.
Category
Flag
Comments
Overall
The article contains meaningful content about the subject matter, and is supported by some citations and multiple sections, but falls short in form and content under the manual of style.
Layout
The article has sections that generally conforms to the standard layout under the manual of style, but is ordered incorrectly or potentially missing sections that may help improve the article.
Lead section
The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article.
The article does not contain a plot section where one may be useful.
Development
The article does not contain a development section, where one may or may not be useful depending on the availability of reliable sources.
Reception
The article does not contain a reception section or lacks substantial content in the section.
Sources
The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is not well cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently or incorrectly cited.