Talk:Bob Heffron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBob Heffron has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 25, 2014Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 10, 2021.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bob Heffron/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grahamec (talk · contribs) 13:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is looking good, I once did some small work on this article, but that has little to do with the current state of the article.

  • A nit-pick: "he presented a proposal to the cabinet outlining the creation of a tenchological-based university in NSW, as a separate expansion from the existing Sydney Technical College". This does not read well. Perhaps it is intended to say something like "as well as".
    • I have now slightly rewritten this.
  • The last sentence:..."which included the building named after her father forty years previously." Has this been mentioned before, I can't see it, maybe it should read: "included a building". Actually I see it now.
  • I have changed the caps at the beginning of parenthetical clauses in a couple of places to reflect my understanding of best practice.
As noted above a couple of the refs are broken and will have to be fixed if you take it to FAC.

So I am passing it.--Grahame (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bob Heffron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Article not eligible for DYK.

Created/expanded by Siegfried Nugent (talk). Self-nominated at 07:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi there, Siegfried Nugent! Unfortunately, I don't think this article qualifies to be featured at DYK. An article must either be less than seven days old, or expanded 5x or promoted to be a good article within seven days. I'm not seeing that any of these requirements were fulfilled. Let me know if you have any questions! I'm sorry we couldn't feature this article, that is a good hook. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 00:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]