Talk:Booths

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

POV check- the criticisms section doesn't cite any sources and therefore lacks evidence to back up the criticisms made.

Fair comment - I'm new to Wiki, and I now realise said material is largely inadmissable 'original research' and personal opinion. So I've scrubbed the worst offending content and shall try again with references; once I can find them. Apologies for tainting the good name of Wiki :) - WOB

Was it really nessecary to remove the weblog link, SoC? I don't see how its presence is Un-Wiki. - WOB

Is the criticisms section nessecary? I propose removing it as none of the information is cited. Also, it does not add to the article nor does it keep the high standards of wikipedia.Gbarnes 5 11:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have to agree, GBarnes. Not on veracity grounds, simply references. I rubbed my original criticisms some time ago in response to the NPOV challenge, but wasn't sure if it was right for me to clear the flag. These new swipes aren't the content referred to by the NPOV flagger, or my work, added by another Booths employee instead. I've contacted the author, suggested they remove them, but I feel they won't; so one of us should. Oh, for the record, I'm involved with the weblog linked to, so must declare a bias, but I still think that links OK. - WOB, 16th Sept 07

Blog link removed by blog author. - WOB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.20.112 (talk) 20:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a Partnership but a Limited Company (EH Booth & Co Ltd) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.63.189 (talk) 17:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Booths new logo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Booths new logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Booths new logo.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing geographic details[edit]

The section headed "The Future" mentions some "recent" store closures, thus:

Although the company has recently closed its Leyland, Penwortham (Liverpool Road), South Shore, Lytham (Market Square) stores, and its oldest store in St. Annes,[9] it is also opening new stores.

I've flagged the "recently" with the {{when}} template, and the list of store locations - incomprehensible to a non-local like me - with the {{vague}} template. Please make this make sense to an outsider if you can! Perhaps it should read something like the following:

The company closed several stores in 2010-2011, including those in Leyland; Penwortham (Liverpool Road); South Shore; Lytham (Market Square); and its oldest store in St. Annes[9]. However, it is also opening new stores.

or even:

The company closed several stores in 2010-2011, including stores in Leyland; in Liverpool Road, Penwortham; in South Shore; in Market Square, Lytham; and its oldest store in St. Annes[9]. However, it is also opening new stores.

yoyo (talk) 07:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Booths. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Booths. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Store list[edit]

The list fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY/WP:NOTGUIDE and as such should be removed, The "areas served" are all in the infobox, Also just to note consensus is to remove these anyway (there's no store list on any article here because obviously consensus is they fail NOTGUIDE/NOTDIR). –Davey2010Talk 16:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the list of supermarkets serves no purpose but the map was informative. A better map would include all the branches and would illistrate the distinctive geographic area more effectively to non-natives. --Northernhenge (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is no map, though one would be very sensible.Deipnosophista (talk) 10:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Booths&oldid=1206375362"