Jump to content

Talk:Bophuthatswana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Enclaves

[edit]

Can anyone confirm the seven enclaves, as the attached map only shows six? 06:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel Ellis (talkcontribs)

Good point. It's six. I must have kept this from the old article w/o checking. Thanks! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mpumalanga??!!

[edit]

Since when was Boph. even close to Mpumalanga??? The article says that the territory was reincorperated into the Free State, North-West, and MPUMALANGA???. We are missing a few places. Some land was given to the N.C, and I think some in the north-east to either Gauteng or Limp. Bezuidenhout (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iuno. I think that was one of the few bits I just copied over from the short mess I found before expansion. Fix it if you can. Eaternmost city was Babelegi, now NW, so yeah, it can't be Mpumalanga. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That would also be anachronistic. Since "Mpumalanga" is a post 1994 creation. There is a piece of Bophuthatswana that is adjoined to KwaNdebele, would have to check if it coincides with present Mpuma. assignation. --41.150.75.7 (talk) 13:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"nominal"

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Please explain in some detail the usage of the term "nominal", used multiple times here. Loew Galitz (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bophuthatswana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bophuthatswana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]