Talk:Borealosaurus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Borealosaurus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

In media

Cut and paste from the article:

"Borealosaurus might have appered in Prehistoric Park, but known as a titanosaur"

What evidence is there to suggest that this titanosaur was Borealosaurus (i.e. the context)? J. Spencer 13:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See in prehistoric park then. Bingodile 14:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this assessment from a viewer's after-the-fact decision using the general time and place of the setting, or did someone actually say Borealosaurus? The difference is that the first case is original research, which is prohibited on Wikipedia, but the second is just a matter of plugging in a reference. It could very well be Borealosaurus, but without them saying so, it could also just be a generic titanosaur, or even an unnamed titanosaur from the same area that the show's producers knew about (it's not uncommon to have multiple genera of sauropods in a formation). J. Spencer 15:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heres a quick link Prehistoric Park#Dinosaurs. Bingodile —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bingodile (talk • contribs) 19:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can't use Wikipedia to cite Wikipedia; also, it appears that you (personally) added that information. J. Spencer 19:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]