Jump to content

Talk:Boxer Ramen/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: REDMAN 2019 (talk · contribs) 13:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will have a look at this shortly.

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]
Okay. (Wow you were quick, I'm still conducting the review!) REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
REDMAN 2019, Yup, I get around! :p ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Description

[edit]
[edit]
  • Link Honolulu.
Done. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

Subsequent locations

[edit]
  • "Camden and Poppe had applied for a liquor license for the restaurant by November 2015, and were joined by new co-owner Matt Lynch." Ref needed.
  • "The trio opened a fourth location along East Burnside Street on December 1, 2017, slightly later than a previously announced opening date of October 15." Ref gives the planned opening date but not when it actually opened. Might be worth moving ref 20 to there and creating a second mention where it currently is.
    • If you insist on having a citation immediately after December 1, 2017, I'll add one, but don't the citations throughout the paragraph support the December 1 claim? I'd say the claim is easily verifiable based on surrounding context and citations, but again, if you insist, I can add. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "In addition to Camden, Poppe, and Lynch, Chris Thornton has been named a co-owner of Boxer Ramen"> In addition to Camden, Poppe, and Lynch, Chris Thornton was named a co-owner of Boxer Ramen in 2020.

Comments

[edit]

I was going to put this on hold. But as you came along and cleaned it up quickly I am able to pass this. It is well written and well sourced and meets GA criteria in my opinion. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

REDMAN 2019, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.