Talk:Cadwell Park

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject British MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject British MotorsportBritish Motorsport articles

Lincolnshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV![edit]

I very nearly put a {{POV}} marker in the text itself, but it messes up the circuit navigation thingy (which is very non-Wikipedia-standard in itself, btw). Could someone with Cadwell knowledge please do some serious toning down of the near-advert quality of some of the text here? It may be true that club meetings here "are invariably crackers", but that doesn't make it NPOV. Loganberry (Talk) 23:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly lacks neutrality. --89.217.18.45 10:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cut & paste from Cadwell's own website!

Please could some one who can do this put in a lap record for superkarts: Div 1 Lap record 1:23.87. Data from http://www.superkart.org.uk/ see lap records page in downloads. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.132.107.162 (talk) 19:37, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

How is a racing circuit article NPOV? Perhaps badly copied from a website. I actually laughed when I saw this. --Taoistlumberjak 17:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy updated to try and tone down some of the worst blatent copy. Dec 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.240.128.75 (talk) 10:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

I have assessed the article and unfortunatly it lacks sources, it is fairly short and needs some work done to get it to a C. I am also concerned about whether this article is completely neutral in terms of bias, which can be clearly seen throughout. I believe looking at the article's content it deserves a mid but I am sceptical due to the neutrality. The fact that this has been pointed out by another user almost 2 years ago is saying something.

95jb14 (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC), a member of WikiProject Lincolnshire[reply]

4 years on and it hasn't improved. Much as I dislike them I have bannered it.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 19:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Mason Ferrari Content[edit]

The article is inaccurate in one key point - Nick Mason didn't actually drive the car! The day was a comparison test between a Ferrari and Porsche - both Le Mans cars from the same era - both owned by Nick Mason. He employed a professional driver for the test. Those of us privileged to be there remember it well... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.55.232 (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cadwell Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090623222350/http://www.britishsuperbike.com:80/events/cadwell-park.aspx to http://www.britishsuperbike.com/events/cadwell-park.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]