Jump to content

User talk:Loganberry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives: 1 .. 2 .. 3 .. 4 .. 5 .. 6 .. 7 .. 8 .. 9 .. 10 .. 11 .. 12 .. 13 .. 14

Evesham Technology

[edit]

Hi Loganberry! It is suggested that a pre PROD, pre AfD, or pre Speedy discussion should take place before opening a deletion process for Evesham Technology. Please visit the article if you can, and leave your comments and suggestions at Talk:Evesham Technology--Kudpung (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Worcs project

[edit]

Hi Loganberry! Please be sure to have these pages on your watch list. There may be movements on them concerning articles or new articles that you may wish to edit or contribute to, but may not be already watching.

BST/ GMT

[edit]

You are quite right, as I realised as soon as I'd gone to bed; I'd typed a load of nonsense. But it didn't quite meet the threshold for getting up to put it right. Rachel Pearce (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Worcestershire meeting?

[edit]

Worcestershire Project get-together
I'm in the UK on a rare trip to my home town in Worcestershire. If all or anyone from the project would like to meet up, please let me know. I'll be returning to Asia on 3 October.--Kudpung (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Loganberry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --86.29.138.86 (talk) 18:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]

Merge discussion for My Father the Hero (1994 film)

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, My Father the Hero (1994 film) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. LizzieHarrison 16:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Parker (cricketer)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Joseph Parker (cricketer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DarkAudit (talk) 21:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Parker (cricketer)

[edit]

The article Joseph Parker (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Declined speedy. First class level at university does not pass WP:ATHLETE as there is a professional level of cricket. The accomplishments at the level played also do not rise to the level of notability expected of university-level athletes. No awards, accolades, or championships.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DarkAudit (talk) 21:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wisden v ICC awards

[edit]

Hi Loganberry!
I would argue that the Sir Garfield Sobers Trophy should be not be removed from "See Also" section of Wisden Cricketers of the Year. Your rationale was that it was "not directly relevant to Wisden, whereas the other entries in this section are". I would demur: a "See Also" section is not limited by by its article. See Wikipedia:See_also#See_also_section. What's more...
oops, Zebedee arrived. :-) --Shirt58 (talk) 13:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again
Thank you for your reply - very much appreciated. There is not much space in an edit summary to make a fully-formed argument, but I should have thought more about this. I now completely agree with you. As you rightly pointed out, this is simply not a matter that should be discussed at any length on an article talk page.
While it could be argued that, by way of their status, the Wisden and ICC awards are the "co-preeminent" Cricket awards[citation needed] and should be included in their respective "see also"s... I suspect this is something that may result in a whole bunch of talk with not much outcome. As you again pointed out, there a lot of Cricket awards, and with each their concomitant partisans. Mmmm... perhaps their should be a cat [[Category:Cricket awards]]
Oh, yes - Zebedee. Though I now know he was only a moustachio'd ping-pong ball on a corkscrew, when I was a kid, Zebedee appeared like some Babylonian demiurge in a kind of mini-Götterdämmerung at the end of each Magic Roundabout. "Zebedee arrived", said the narrator, and then with a voice like Metatron (or, alternatively, Pilate in the Wakefield Mystery Plays) Zebedee would say "time for bed". --Shirt58 (talk) 11:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. cat [[Category:Cricket_awards_and_rankings]] already exists.--Shirt58 (talk) 12:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Malvern, GA nomination

[edit]
Hi Loganberry ! We now have a first review for GA. On the whole it doesn't look too bad. As you know, I am a local resident in absentia, and as a published author, a 'prose artist', but anything you can do to improve the language or address some of the more technical points as quickly as possible would be much appreciated. Any work on the new referencing system does not affect the overall quality and scope of the article for GA but you may be able to put put some of the wrong referencing things right and offer some suggestions on the other points made by the reviewer. It would be great for the Worcs project to have a GA of this envergure in its repertoire. See Talk:Malvern, Worcestershire#GA Review - and Happy New Year!--Kudpung (talk) 05:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MGC

[edit]

Hi Loganberry! An article within the scope of the WikiProject Worcestershire has been proposed for moving. Please see the discussion at Talk:Malvern Girls' College#Move proposal, and leave your comments there. Thanks. This is a message to Worcestershire project members; if it has been placed on your talk page in error, please ignore and/or delete it.--Kudpung (talk) 10:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Malvern Girls College has now been moved to Malvern St James and a new article substituted. --Kudpung (talk) 18:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

[edit]
Master Editor Hello, Loganberry! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

malvern cricketers

[edit]

Hi Loganberry. Over the centuries, Malvern College has spawned an extraordinary number of top-class cricketers. A List of Old Malvernians (notable alumnae only) has been created that contains many of those cricketers. There are however problems in complying with Wiki rules for providing reliable sources. If you have time, perhaps you could cast an eye over the list and check that the parent Wiki articles on these people are accurately sourced regarding their studies and/or cricket performance at Malvern College. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Worcestershierre, Warwickshierre, Yorkshierre, and Everyshierre

[edit]

Hello Loganberry! A non-British user seems to be attempting to suggest that the Brits are not pronouncing their own British place names correctly, and appears to believe that it is a policy of Wikipedia to instruct the Brits, through the use of the IPA, how British English should be pronounced. He/she also seems to be of the opinion that it is Wikipedia policy to regard British English by default as a rhotic language, which it is not. Some British Wikipedians are trying to avoid an edit conflict and have requested my support. I have added my comments to the debate the non-British user has has started in defence of his/her multiple, WP:BOLD? changes to IPA pronunciations of British place names. As a professional linguist I accord every version of English its own particular merits and my position here strictly concerns the way in which the IPA is interpreted and applied in the Wikipedia, and how the current policy may need to be changed through a truly representative consensus. If you would like to help resolve this issue, please see User talk:Kudpung#IPA, RP, etc. and User talk:Lfh#Warwickshire to get the background. Maybe you could then chime in with your views on the subject at Wikipedia talk:IPA for English#Rhoticity in place names. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

News

[edit]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Loganberry! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Christopher Collier (historian) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Martyn Griffiths - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Dave Orchard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Roger Moran - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need your Opinion?

[edit]

I would be helpful if you can give me your opinion on this post. Thanks. Paul2387 22:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

news

[edit]
The WORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - March 2010

The WikiProject WORCESTERSHIRE Newsletter
No. 2 - March 2010
(Archived here.)
Morgan car factory main entrance, Malvern Link, Worcestershire
Welcome to the second WikiProject Worcestershire newsletter

You are probably receiving this because you have significantly contributed to one of our pages. If you are not yet a participant in the Worcestershire project, now is the time to consider joining - it might help you get some assistance on a page you feel particularly attached to.
Here goes for the second irregular news bulletin...

First GA in 2010

We finally got over our euphoria over the Malvern, Worcestershire promotion to Good Article status. The GA sets a benchmark for the quality to be targeted for other articles in the project, and clearly demonstrated how important teamwork is.

Recently founded

A lot of work has already been done since the Worcs project was started, including the recent tagging of the talk pages of all the articles about people connected with Worcestershire, keeping spam and vandalism at bay, and welcoming new editors on their talk pages.

Experts needed!

The Worcestershire project mainly concerns settlements. It's generally agreed that the immediate priority now is to improve the articles that shiould be the flagships of the project, namely Worcester, and Worcestershire which are some of the articles in the worst state.

Meet up

Kudpung has booked his flight from Asia and will be back in Malvern from 1 April for a month, and looks forward to meeting up with as many Wikipedians as possible, especially those who work on the Worcs project.

NEWS

Two major debates are raging on the 'pedia and we have been cautiously taking part.

WP:BLP (Biography of Living Persons)

In for a shake up is an accumulation of nearly 50,000 totally unsourced articles that may end up on the cutting room floor after a period of grace. As a project, we can help by taking a look at those BLP in the county and doing what we can before the axe falls.

citations

A war almost broke out over citation formats, but a mature approach from Worcs project members prevented any physical injury. There, are only three basic rules for citations: 1. All articles must have them. 2. Consitency of format throughout an articles. 3. Changes to the format require a consensus.
We are not obliged to use citation templates, and WP:LDR might not be such a good idea while chunks of text and/or their references are being copied and pasted around related articles in the county. In any case, let's always discuss what we have in mind HERE.

new project pages

The project main page has been pruned to be cleaner, and much of the support material has been transferred to dedicated pages. New usefull banners and templates have been created, and shortcuts to the new pages that also include a side bar navigator and a brand new easily edited To Do list.

new participant

After all the hints getting him to join, we now welcome User:wotnow !

sysop (admin)

Our only admin has resigned his tools. It would be great to have an active admin as a member of the project. If you think you would be able to cope with all the responsibility adminship involves, checkout WP:RfA and nominate yourself. Nobody needs to have a high edit count or to be an expert in all areas, but being active, having a reasonable overview of the workings of the Wikipedia, and a decent level of maturity, are expected minima. The process is not painless, and is worse than a British army promotion board! Alternatively you can always nominate another user.

Would you like to join the WP:WORCS?? Please enter yourself at WP:WORCS! - new editors are always welcome!

Happy Wikying, and thanks to everyone else who has contributed to our articles.

New project resources

Before making any major edits to articles or stubs, please be sure to read the new WP:WORCS/HowTo. Urgent tasks are now listed at: WP:WORCS/ToDo. It should be referred to often, and will be your main stop for most maintenance tasks. We recommend keeping the page on your watchlist. Most project pages now have brand new side bar for easy navigation. (Thanks, GyroMagician). Priority Articles== The top priority articles have been identified as probably being:

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire.

Other priorities:

  • The recommended priority by kind is for creation/improvement of complete articles is:
  1. Places in the county
  2. Schools in the county (Particularly susceptible to vandalism - please keep them on your watch lists if possible).
  3. Transport in the county
  4. Notable buildings/objects/geo features/AONB/Heritage sites, etc. in the county
  5. History in the county
  6. Industry & Commerce in the county.
  7. People in the county - NOTE: These all need the Worcs project banner adding to their talk pages, and assessing.
  8. County related articles about things not actually in the county, and/or other related projects.

These lists will help:

New Aims

Specific aims for the project are:-

  • Monitor
    The watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
  • Infoboxes
    Some of our articles need their infoboxes completing infobox.
  • References
    Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference. If you are uploadiing an image, be sure it has a correct FUR, and that you have preferably already created a link on the page where you want it to be.
  • Moves, merges, and multiple edits
    Please be careful when performing articles moves and check if anyone seems to be in the middle of doing the same thing. If he; she, or they are, stop and have a chat about it. Otherwise you may be unintentionally duplicating or reverting each other's work. This is particularly important if an article is currently under a GA review. image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Guidelines

Get your article referenced now!

Imprint
Written by User:Kudpung • All comments to WT:WORCS
Based on an original concept by WP:YORKS

CfD nomination of Category:MCC cricketers

[edit]

I have nominated Category:MCC cricketers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Marylebone Cricket Club cricketers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox recent cricketer

[edit]

Template:Infobox recent cricketer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silly

[edit]

It would be great if you could comment here if it is still open for comment. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Worcestershire

[edit]

Hey. I'm not too sure exactly where it was I found it, but I know it was via some Google searches for "Worcestershire flag" and the like. It was just on a site which labelled it as such, although it's not really a decent image and probably not even official. I just uploaded it onto here as I wanted something to at least represent that county on my little list. Ը२ձւե๓ձռ17 19:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Loganberry. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire.
Message added 11:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Embarrass, Wisconsin

[edit]

The community was named after the river, whose name derives from French for "impede" or entangle," because logs so often snagged along the waterway —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.29.131.201 (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Worcestershire

[edit]

Hi Loganberry! an article you have contributed to, has been selected for the Wikipedia Version 0.8. offline release on DVD and iPhone. If you would like to make any last minutes changes or improvements, you are most welcome to do so. Deadline is midnight UTC on Monday, 11 October. See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire/Archive 1#Worcestershire articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release for other selected articles you may wish to update.--Kudpung (talk) 05:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evesham GAC

[edit]

Hi Loganberry. Evesham is now nearing Good Article quality and will shortly be nominated for review. If you have anything to contribute than can improve its scope or quality, please do not hesitate to chip in.. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 09:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Brown

[edit]

Hello

You have written an article on Ali Brown. It says in the first section that his best score was 268 not out vs Glamorgan in 2002. The not out part is incorrect - he was out (in the last over I think) bowled by Kasprowicz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.185.117.220 (talk) 10:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WORCS

[edit]

Hi Loganberry. In order to more accurately interpret Wikipedia policy, it has been suggested that we rename the Malvern, Worcestershire page. Please see the proposal at Talk:Malvern, Worcestershire#Suggested page move where you are welcome to voice your opinion. --Kudpung (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moro (chocolate bar)

[edit]

Just noticed this page due to reverting some vandalism. The four images used need to be tweaked with either FURs or text-logo rationales. I have not marked them as an issue yet but you may want to take a look anyway considering your previous contributions. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Press-up to "Push-up"

[edit]

As a user who has participated in move discussions for the article Press-up, I invite you to weigh in on the move discussion currently under way: Talk:Press-up#Requested_move_2. -Clconway (talk) 01:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evesham

[edit]

Hi Loganberry. A Worcestershire Project page has now been taken on by a reviewer for Good Article after a very long wait. Several points need addressing, but the page has not been rejected as an immediate fail. If you have time, please see Talk:Evesham, and if you can address any of the points listed, I'm sure that between us we can get it through to GA. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote in WP:CRIC

[edit]

There has been a issue in WT:CRIC that needs your vote. Thanks --ashwinikalantri talk 06:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:MCC cricketers

[edit]

Category:MCC cricketers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 23:36, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Climate of Miami

[edit]

Greetings,

Regarding the below edit:

(cur | prev) 16:48, 8 February 2012‎ Loganberry (talk | contribs)‎ (9,297 bytes) (Coldest on record is 30F, not 27F (-1C is correct) -- see http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd/extremelow.html) (undo)

27F is correct. The "extreme low" climate records are for a limited time period (usually 30 years), not forever.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mfl/?n=miami_february_climate

Ryoung122 18:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion: Touring car and Tourer

[edit]

You are invited to a discussion on the merging of the articles Touring car and Tourer at Talk:Touring car#Merge proposal. I look forward to your participation and insight. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 01:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:Clearway ends sign.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

[edit]

Hi Loganberry! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 09:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Loganberry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Loganberry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV

[edit]

Please refrain from expressing points of view such as those in Albert Shutt and similar articles. It is not for you to say that someone who could play first-class cricket was "extremely poor", etc. All POV comments like that are being removed. Jack | talk page 22:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Loganberry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trof for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trof until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing++ 13:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Multiple BHCC champions

[edit]

Template:Multiple BHCC champions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tekom Technologies

[edit]
Notice

The article Tekom Technologies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company, nothing to suggest notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayWhat did I do? 05:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of W. Baker (Worcestershire cricketer) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W. Baker (Worcestershire cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. Baker (Worcestershire cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 06:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maneer Mirza for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maneer Mirza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maneer Mirza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 19:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harshad Patel for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harshad Patel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harshad Patel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter WikiProject Worcestershire

[edit]

Worcestershire - one of England's oldest and still existing (with some minor boundary changes) ceremonial and political shires, famous for its nearly 1000 year old cathedral, the River Severn, the AONB of the Malvern Hills, some of the oldest schools in the country, England's fastest growing university, apples, pears, cider and cricket, and of course its world famous sauce. The Wikiproject is now in need of some attention. Created 12 years ago, this project amassed a huge resource for editors working on all kinds of articles and categories related in some way or another to the county. Kudpung is more or less retired from Wikipedia getting on for 2 years ago and it would be good if a group of editors could get it up to date and continue to maintain it.
Opt out of this message list here.
WikiProject Worcestershire 14:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martin Bell (skier)

[edit]
Notice

The article Martin Bell (skier) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Worcestershire Newsletter - May 2023

[edit]
The WORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - May 2023

The WikiProject WORCESTERSHIRE Newsletter
Issue 3 - May 2023
(Archived here.)
This photo of the medieval cloisters in Worcester Cathedral by Diliff appeared as picture of the day on 5 October 2016.


Welcome to the third WikiProject Worcestershire newsletter

and the first one in (checks notes) THIRTEEN years! When I first joined this WikiProject back in December last year, I was slightly tempted to mark it as inactive, as activity had extremely slowed and there had been no new participants in 3 years. But I have decided to revive this project, as Worcestershire means a lot to me and I know it does for so many others. But as many participants of this project have disappeared completely off Wikipedia, this project is now in dire need of attention and it would be helpful if a group of editors could join me and continue to maintain it.
Here goes for the third EXTREMELY irregular news bulletin...

What's happened since last time

Evolution of Worcestershire county boundaries since 1844 was promoted to Good article on 3 September 2014. Largely the work of Bellow558, a Worcestershire Project member, the article was reviewed by Mike Christie.

Hanley Castle High School was was promoted to Good article on 30 August 2012. There are 78 good articles for educational institution of all kinds of which there are 4 GA for secondary schools in the UK. Hanley High School is the first state school in the UK to become GA.

Evesham was nominated on 2 December 2010 as a Good Article Candidate. The nomination unfortunately failed due to unforeseen unavailability of the editors working on the article. It only requires minor attention to be renominated.

Worcester Castle was awarded Good Article status on 27 October 2011. Largely the work of User:Hchc2009 , the article was reviewed and promoted by User:Malleus Fatuorum.

The photo by David Iliff of the medieval cloisters in Worcester Cathedral (pictured above) appeared as picture of the day on 5 October 2016.

Urse d'Abetot was awarded Featured Article status on 13 October 2009. Promoted by Karanacs, the article was 96.4% the work of Ealdgyth. It was finally featured on the main page on 14 April 2018.

The Battle of Powick Bridge was awarded Featured Article status in 2020 and appeared on the Main Page on 12 February 2023.

Worcestershire articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 1 4 6
FL 1 1
GA 4 3 6 13
B 2 5 14 14 1 36
C 1 5 21 76 3 106
Start 16 51 395 35 497
Stub 6 579 19 604
List 3 7 29 39
NA 1 1 22 341 365
Assessed 3 35 104 1,126 341 58 1,667
Unassessed 3 10 13
Total 3 35 104 1,129 341 68 1,680
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 6,667 Ω = 5.28
Experts needed!

If you notice any editors contributing significantly to Worcestershire-related articles, then please ask them to join this WikiProject, as we need all the help we can get.

Would you like to join the WP:WORCS?? Please enter yourself at WP:WORCS! - new editors are always welcome!

Happy Wikying, and thanks to everyone else who has contributed to our articles.

New project resources

Before making any major edits to articles or stubs, please be sure to read the new WP:WORCS/HowTo. Urgent tasks are now listed at: WP:WORCS/ToDo. It should be referred to often, and will be your main stop for most maintenance tasks. We recommend keeping the page on your watchlist.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire. The current priorities:

  • Population
    Now that the 2021 census details have been released, most settlement articles need updating. This website: https://www.citypopulation.de/ can be helpful, although you should note this does not collect data from hamlets or small villages.
  • Monitor
    The watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
  • Infoboxes
    Some of our articles need their infoboxes completing.
  • References
    Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference. If you are uploadiing an image, be sure it has a correct FUR, and that you have preferably already created a link on the page where you want it to be.

These lists will help:

Guidelines
Missing civil parishes

There is a project creating missing civil parish articles in England at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. The missing parishes in Worcestershire currently are:

Evesham project

I am currently planning on reforming the Evesham article to get it up to scratch for another GA nomination. If other editors are interested in helping me then please do, especially if you live in Evesham yourself, as the main photo is from 2008 and is out-of-date as there is a new statue in front of the building.

On the newsletter

I intend to write a brand-new newsletter once every two months, though I would like other editors to help me in completing it in case of my unavailability.

Imprint
Written by Ollieisanerd (some sections are same as last time written by Kudpung) • All comments to WT:WORCS
Based on an original concept by WP:YORKS

If you wish to opt-out of future Newsletters, please remove yourself from the Newsletter mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North of England cricket team for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North of England cricket team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North of England cricket team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DarklarkOxs (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Brian Brain

[edit]

On 8 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Brian Brain, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicholas Boulton

[edit]
Notice

The article Nicholas Boulton has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who put Bella in the Wych Elm?

[edit]

Hi, Loganberry, there's a discussion going on at the above article in which I quote your acute remark on the Talk page there about the ambiguity of its subject. That was back in 2007 but if you do have time and interest to drop in there and offer some more wisdom, that would be helpful. Thanks either way. Sweetpool50 (talk) 09:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loganberry&oldid=1245657472"