Talk:Cagayan de Oro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Metro Cagayan de Oro, fact or fiction[edit]

Can anyone cite facts on the use of this name? Has the local government passed a resolution creating this so called "Metro Cagayan de Oro"? I am from Cagayan de Oro and have not even heard the City Government use this name.VisitCDO (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Metro cagayan de oro was just a talk. I believe there is no written rule regarding any creation of a Metro cagayan de Oro Cemby (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CdeO, CDO or CDOC[edit]

When Ms. Roa, the City Historical Commissioner first proposed the use of the term CdeO, I just rolled my eyes. Her main complaint was "some visitors" kept on asking her if CDO Foods (meat products based in Manila) were sold here in Cagayan de Oro. I am not sure who her "visitors" were but for the past years, I have never heard from any of my Manila friends or local tourists comparing Cagayan de Oro with CDO Foods.

This year Ms. Roa proposed in the City Council to use CdeO instead of CDO. To make her proposal more credible, she used a "historical" argument to the name CdeO. She cited that the word "de" had some historical significance considering the old name of Cagayan de Oro was Cagayan de Misamis. What some local journalists and historians could not grasp is how could the word "de" be that historical to Cagayan? It is like saying that "de" in Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU) has some historical value because it is used in all of the Ateneo schools (Ateneo de Davao, Ateneo de Naga, etc...). And how does one pronounce CdeO against CDO to differentiate the other? CdeO and CDO sounds the same unless you pronounce "de" as letter "d" and "e" which makes it more awkward. You can differentiate the two only in written form but not verbally. I find it more correct to use the initials CDOC. If we are going to use 4 characters (CDEO), we might as well use the correct initials of Cagayan De Oro City and that is CDOC. VisitCDO (talk) 06:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cagayan de Oro has 2 area codes[edit]

MisOrTel or the Misamis Oriental Telephone System is a provincial government owned company. It manages the entire provincial telephone system including the cities of Cagayan de Oro and Gingoog. When the telecom industry was opened to new players, Misortel refused to allow other telecom carriers to interconnect and use their system. Hence Philcom, Cruztelco and other phone carriers applied for a new area code and had a separate system. It was only recent that these telecom carriers interconnected with each other. VisitCDO (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2008 (UTC)put a tang in a moo!!![reply]

Lourdes College is not a university[edit]

The education article is not a list of Cagayan de Oro schools. To avoid cluttering the article, only institutions that has achieved university status will be included. Go to List of colleges and universities in the Philippines if you wish to include your college in the list. VisitCDO (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because of high ratio of students attending local colleges, Lourdes College, STI, and Mindanao Polytechnic State College, or MPSC, offer high number of courses. Why are there AMA and Philippine Women College listed here when they do not offer number of courses. If you exclude Broward Community College (BBC) from Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood-Pompano articles, then I am sure lot of South Florida Wikipedians will be enraged at your fruitless move. To be list such a school first should be accredited with Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and Universities D. Richard 10:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC) Now, am longest Deaf American expatriate living outside Manila. You can read more of me in my blog

University status[edit]

Correction, it is Philippine Womens University (PWU). It is a Manila based university. We have to acknowledge their presence in the city even though they offer limited courses. To avoid cluttering the education paragraph only institutions with university status shall be included. Remember, this is an encyclopedia not a list of things that you just add if you feel like doing so.VisitCDO (talk) 09:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Greatly Improved[edit]

This article has been thoroughly edited, although it isn't perfect; the content, grammar, and format of this article has been greatly improved. The article is now easier to read and understand, has a better outline, good spelling and grammar, is unbiased, and has plenty of credible references. Therefore, I nominated it for a "GA" rating; and have taken the liberty to change the Tambayan rating from "Start-Class" to "B-Class" after carefully reading through the Tambayan FAQ. -- Heroditoes 14:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck! --seav 01:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bibianne[edit]

hi.... first time to check the city through the web, its nice to see pictures from where I belong.... just want to comment about how updated the article is cause i read something like jaraula is still the mayor... im here in manila now and i always promote the city, by letting my fellows here see the website.. hope that you would always update this site to promote tourism.. cant wait to again.. ciao.... tc.. =

► Hi Bibianne, Jaraula is really the current mayor now. He was elected last May 2007 election. As far as I know, some informations on this site are updated but some are not. It only depends if someone will edit it. Actually, anyone all over the world is welcome to edit or add any informations on the site. To make it clear to you, read the informations about wikipedia first so that you'll know what its all about. :-) kagay-anon ni bay



hello what the heck does "1st class city mean" mean? i have never encountered this before. unsigned comment by User:Simastrick

It's a classification based on the city's income (explained here). I probably added that line tot the article... sorry, should've made it more clear. Coffee 16:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights[edit]

I am having second thoughts of contributing new articles in Wikipedia considering that copyrights are not respected. One Cagayan de Oro website used word for word (verbatim) the main article of Cagayan de Oro Wikipedia. It did not acknowledge Wikipedia as its source and copyrighted it as its own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.84.106.196 (talk) 02:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

I read your article about cagayan de oro city and i really appreciate it. nice work keep it up. sorry to hear about copyrights hope somebody could help you about it.203.177.182.31 13:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

more pictures?[edit]

it would be good if pictures will be added to the article.

I added some pictures of my own. Please comment about them.Ady001 15:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accurate to the year?[edit]

The first sentence of the History section reads: "The area of present Cagayan de Oro has been occupied by indigenous people for approximately 41,114 years." How accurate is this number? Prehistoric dates/years are mostly written as estimates (i.e. ends in ,000's), so it seems weird to have this number. Sharksfin 10:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV Statements[edit]

Saying things like "People from Cagayan de Oro are warm and hospitable", "Since then, Cagayan de Oro became one of the most progressive cities in the whole archipelago", and "Cagayan de Oro is one of the most progressive cities in the Philippines" violate the policy WP:NPOV. I have removed those statements. While these may be true, it is not appropriate to include them in Wikipedia without supporting evidence.

Policies on External Links[edit]

Reposting a notice made by Nposs regarding Wikipedia policy on external links and spam.

Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. VisitCDO 07:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


WW II Liberation of Cagayan[edit]

During the liberation of Cagayan, aerial bombardment was done by American forces. At that time Filipinos did not have planes and had no knowledge in operating a US bomber. See Philippine Airforce history http://www.paf.mil.ph/HISTORY/history.html VisitCDO 02:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cagayan de Oro City seal.png[edit]

Image:Cagayan de Oro City seal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

I'm failing this article as a good article for, although much laudable effort has been put in, it falls too far short of the criteria today.

Well written

Lots of issues with the text. Some are style based but there are grammar issues and much of the article is not flowing prose, but instead a little too dot-pointy.

  • the lead is too short and does not adequately summarise the article (see WP:LEAD)
  • for a relatively short article there are too many sections (hence the table of contents is excessive)
  • Needs (some) more wikilinks. There are sections like "Economy" with none at all
  • Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers) -
  • Wikilink dates for date preferences to work - so February 27, 1872 becomes February 27 1872. The use of this is inconsistent in the article.
  • There are lots of short sections and paragraphs. Merge sections and paragraphs eg: The entire "Law Enforcement" section should be a single paragraph with no subheadings as there is simply not enough information for breakup to be required.
  • Headings with & in them should be converted to "and" and decapitalised so "Parks & Resorts" -> "Parks and resorts"
  • The text needs work to reduce redundancy and fix grammer errors eg:
    "The city's major religion is Roman Catholic. Other religions include, but are not limited to; Other Christians (Aglipay, Baptists, and Iglesia ni Kristo), Muslims, and other religions." has redundancy and other issues. ", but are not limited to;" should be just a colon and ", and other religions." is not required as it is implicit in the word "include"
  • There is inconsistency in the reference formatting. If using the cite templates please use Template:cite web for the web references
Factualness
  • The article needs more, and written references and information from off-line sources. There are unreferenced parts and the article relies entirely on web-references. There appear to be books talking about the city's legal system, urban development, sociology etc.. Books like "History of Cagayan de Oro, 1622-1901 (Mardonio M. Lao)" and others need to be used to get sufficient depth.
Broad in coverage?
  • For a city of almost 1/2 million people existing for 130+ years and a provincial capital there is simply not enough information.

See the good city article Belfast for a view of the level of detail that makes a broad article. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]



Reaction to GA Review

"Ah screw you!" was my first reaction the article's assessment, however after taking a step back from the situation, I do admit to its faults, and thank you for the time and energy you spent on reviewing the article. I doubt that I'll be able to acquire the recommended text, and therefore will cease my contributions. =P Heroditoes out!

Heroditoes (talk) 14:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference from Wikitravel[edit]

This reference is merely a copy of the Cagayan de Oro Wikitravel.org article. Compare the two sites. http://wikitravel.org/en/Cagayan_de_oro http://www.panamacrawler.com/travelguides/Cagayan_de_Oro.html VisitCDO (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph map cagayandeorocity.PNG[edit]

Image:Ph map cagayandeorocity.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal cagayandeorocity.jpg[edit]

Image:Ph seal cagayandeorocity.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cagayan de Oro Pride[edit]

is that the hymn of the city of cagayan de oro, if it is the hymn, put it in the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.84.120.60 (talk) 13:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Pursuant to an e-mail addressed to the Wikimedia Foundation, Ticket:2009091910002635, investigation discovered that multiple portions of this article duplicated other sources, especially http://cdoguide.com/sights/index.html. The article has been restored to an earlier version prior to the introduction of this text, which must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

Because this copyright violation was restored by an unstable IP contributor, the article has had to be semi-protected to prevent unregistered and new accounts from editing it. If this material is restored after the protection expires, further steps will be necessary, either in extended protection of this article or range blocking involved IPs. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because the text was restored again, the protection on this article has now had to be extended. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=Cagayan_De_Oro_City. (Prior to Wikipedia's licensing transition, material could be incorporated from wikipilipinas, but since November 2008 it cannot be.) Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 03:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • And once again prett6y much as soon as the semiprotection expired the anons added copyright violating content from the same sites. Semiprotection extended again. Guy (Help!) 16:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

St. Augustine Metropolitan Cathedral or San Agustin Metropolitan Cathedral?[edit]

If you use the local language, the name of the cathedral would be San Agustin, however the Archdiocese of Cagayan de Oro is using the official English name of the cathedral, which is St. Augustine. Please see Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) Official website http://www.cbcponline.net/cagayan_de_oro/html/parishes.html VisitCDO (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<Cityname> <City>[edit]

There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article names of Philippine cities. This may imminently affect the article name for Cagayan de Oro. For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented. Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion. If you wish to participate, please post your comments here. --JinJian (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Baguio City which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 07:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article lacks unity, coherence and development, as well as many basic information about the topic, and subtopics. I also found some grammatical errors and redundancy. Is there any way that I can edit some parts of and contribute to this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leanlester (talk • contribs) 21:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How can we edit the info in this article? This article failed to mention the Kahimunan Regional Trade Fair (RTF) which is an annual event organized by the Department of Trade and Industry -10 in time of the Kagay-an Festival. The Kahimunan RTF is a core event of the Kagay-an Festival that showcases the products and services of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) of the region. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sada haniko (talk • contribs) 05:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Highly Urbanized City[edit]

In recent estimation of Census, the cagayan de oro city has over 800,000+ population in 2010. This will make as a highly urbanized city in Northern Mindanao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HariezNor (talk • contribs) 12:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cagayandeoro skyline.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Cagayandeoro skyline.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelaez Sports Complex.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Pelaez Sports Complex.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cagayan de oro skyline2.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Cagayan de oro skyline2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Cagayan de oro skyline2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cagayan De Oro street scene.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Cagayan De Oro street scene.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Cagayan De Oro street scene.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heading Climate , Specifically The Weather Box ( Data )[edit]

L.S. ,

Can someone please insert the weather box ( data ) correctly as the month of December and Yearly averages are now ( super ) imposed on the Nasa photo and main info box on the right . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.92.72.214 (talk) 00:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Population Census Link - Page Not Found[edit]

L.S. ,

The link supplied and referenced in the text of the very first paragraph , top of the page , relating to the 2010 Population Census doesn't work - it results in a Page Not Found error . I have found another official and working link from the Philippine's National Statistical Coordination Board ( NSCB ) but I don't know how to insert it , could someone please do this ? Link : http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/municipality.asp?muncode=104305000&regcode=10&provcode=43 Takes you directly to the results , namely Population ( as of 01 May 2010 ) : 602088 . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.92.72.214 (talk) 02:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting Information Regarding Population Count For Cagayan De Oro : 602088 versus 11.4 million ?[edit]

L.S. ,

The author of this article states in the very first paragraph , top of the page QUOTE : According to the 2010 Census of Population in the Philippines, Cagayan de Oro has an estimated population of 602,088 (2.78%) inhabitants—making it the 10th most populous city in the Philippines. UNQUOTE

BUT

The author of this article states in ( Header ) QUOTE Demographics As of the 2010 Census of Population in the Philippines, the population of the city was 11,477,344 making it the 10th most populous city in the Philippines. UNQUOTE .

I've verified that the population figure for Cagayan De Oro is correct , namely 602088 BUT where does this 11.4 million come from in Demographics and what does this figure of 11.4 million number represent ? For a fact it isn't the population of Cagayan de Oro but what does it represent and where can this be verified ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.190.129.236 (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Cagayan de Oro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cagayan de Oro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cagayan de Oro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cagayan_de_Oro&oldid=1220595280"