Talk:Challenge 21
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Challenge 21 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
These seem to have nothing to do with Challenge 21
[edit]- "The scheme has at times been operated in an overzealous manner. The BBC reported that a grandmother, aged 47, was refused the ability to purchase alcohol despite being 29 years older than the legal age limit. The woman's daughter, aged 22, was similarly refused even though she could provide ID as the staff-member was concerned that the daughter could have passed the wine to her mother."
This is a case of operating something entirely different in an overzealous manner: a policy of asking all members of a group for ID in order to proceed with the sale. But this is in itself ridiculous:
- somebody buying alcohol for somebody under 18 to drink need not bring that somebody into the shop at all
- you might need to find somebody to babysit your toddler just so you can buy alcohol while on your normal weekly shopping trip
- if your child is 5 or over, it isn't even illegal to give him/her alcohol, so what does the retailer think it's doing anyway?
- "The Blackpool Gazette reported that a 72-year-old man had been refused the purchase of alcohol because of the failure to produce a form of Identity card."
From what I can make out, this can only be due to a policy of asking all customers for ID, regardless of how old they look. While this may just as well be overzealous, it's the only policy that makes logical sense given the strict policies many places have on what forms of ID they'll accept. As I once wrote: if you don't think student ID cards, dedicated proof of age cards or whatever are verifiable forms of ID, what on earth makes you think that any judgement of how old someone looks is? -- Smjg (talk) 00:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Out of date - challenge 25
[edit]This article is out of date, as most of the major retailers (and many smaller ones) are now using Challenge 25, not just Asda. http://www.talkingretail.com/news/industry-news/retailers-launch-challenge-25-alcohol-scheme 86.161.29.90 (talk) 01:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Challenge 21. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070615204350/http://www.offlicencenews.co.uk:80/articles/33766/Asda-raises-bar-over-ID.aspx?categoryid=9059 to http://www.offlicencenews.co.uk/articles/33766/Asda-raises-bar-over-ID.aspx?categoryid=9059
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Challenge 21. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829084121/http://www.beerandpub.com:80/content.asp?id_Content=2573&id_ContentType=1 to http://www.beerandpub.com/content.asp?id_Content=2573&id_ContentType=1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003071903/http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk:80/news/archive/challenge21.htm to http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/news/archive/challenge21.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080119233715/http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk:80/press-releases/underage-sales-down to http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk/press-releases/underage-sales-down
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk/press-releases/alcohol-industry-underage-sales.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100204050326/http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk:80/press-releases/Joint_Crackdown_On_Underage_Drin.html to http://press.homeoffice.gov.uk/press-releases/Joint_Crackdown_On_Underage_Drin.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)