Talk:Chilesaurus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Placement still uncertain?[edit]

Years since the description of Chilesaurus, is the animal still considered a taxonomic anomaly? The way it's treated here is inconsistent; the category suggests theropod but the template suggests ornithischian. This needs fixing. Should we aim to be taxonomically neutral? Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]