Talk:Clarence Abiathar Waldo

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled[edit]

Out of curiosity, why does this man have a wikipedia page? He seems utterly insignificant, despite his tangential role to the Indiana Pi bill.--Francisx 00:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I read accounts of the Indiana pi bill, I got somewhat curious of this Waldo figure whose sad fate is to have become known for something that he himself probably regarded as utterly tangential to his own life. Basically the only thing one easily finds about him by googling is his involvment in the IPB affair, but natural curiosity demands to know more: which mathematics did he actually do, and so forth. Such things do not belong in the IPB article, but it is very convenient to have a repository for whatever information about the man history has passed down. The wonder of Wikipedia is that we can have that without inconveniencing those who don't find him interesting. I for one is happy to know the information that the editors of this article dug up. Is is so much to assume that others may be similarly curious, and is is not exactly the job of an encyclopedia to satisfy this curiosity? Henning Makholm 07:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can show that Waldo's mathematical work was significant, he clearly fails to meet wiki standards for notability (which explicitly excludes otherwise unremarkable college professors). His tangential relationship to a minor and only marginally notable political non-event does not make him notable either. I'm not going to push for the article's deletion, but it is a textbook vanity. I should add that there are lots of subjects I find personally interesting that are not notable by wiki standards, and there are lots of notable encyclopedic subjects that I find completely uninteresting; my personal interest in the man is irrelevent. --Francisx 23:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Textbook vanity? The man lived in the 19th century and is long dead. Do you propose that he has come back from the dead to create a Wikipedia article about himself? And why do you suppose that, simply because he was employed as a mathematics professor, the only thing that can make him notable is his mathematical work? It is an empirical fact that real living Wikipedia editors have found him significant enough to go out and actively look for information for a biography of him because they would have liked to be able to read it here and (correctly) assumed that others would like to read it here, too. An active search for information must have been made; this is not the kind of facts that anyboy memoizes for a hobby. Henning Makholm 23:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last resting-place, grave[edit]

I'm slightly disappointed to find no hints about the location. --84.178.22.109 (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Clarence Abiathar Waldo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]