Jump to content

Talk:Convergence culture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 23 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jtakin02, ParkerJennings, TheSeedV, Metroidm. Peer reviewers: Atallent, TyraWashington, KRCPhilmon.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 28 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmason7. Peer reviewers: Maddiasahatter, Nfreddo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): S0376334. Peer reviewers: Jvanella23.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]
  • Inwood, Heather. "Multimedia Quake Poetry: Convergence Culture After the Sichuan Earthquake." The China Quarterly 208 (2011): 932-50. ProQuest. 3 Feb. 2020 .
  • Jenkins, Henry. "Participatory Culture: From Co-Creating Brand Meaning to Changing the World." GfK Marketing Intelligence Review 6.2 (2014): 34-9. ProQuest. 3 Feb. 2020
  • Collard, Christophe. "THE CONVERGENCE CULTURE OF CONSUMER CULTURE: TRANSMEDIAL STORYTELLING FOR 99 FRANCS." Literature/Film Quarterly 42.3 (2014): 515-27. ProQuest. 3 Feb. 2020

Jayla P (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Contribution

[edit]

A converging technological environment involves the changes in technology that cause different technological systems to develop and perform similar tasks.[1] Older media such as television and radio provided the single task of broadcasting while new media can perform multiple tasks. [2] Smartphones are an example of new media and a convergent device that can be used for not only making phone calls and sending text messages but also used for surfing the internet, watching videos, paying bills, accessing social media, and so on. [3] Social media platforms are forms of new media that create new models of social convergence. Platforms like Google have managed to expand their services to allow a single sign-on that connects a user's workplace to their entertainment system to create a converging technological environment. [4] [5] Mmason7 (talk) 17:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ James Hay & Nick Couldry (2011) RETHINKING CONVERGENCE/CULTURE, Cultural Studies, 25:4-5, 473-486, DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2011.600527
  2. ^ https://psu.pb.unizin.org/ist110/chapter/8-1-technological-divergence/
  3. ^ https://psu.pb.unizin.org/ist110/chapter/8-1-technological-divergence/
  4. ^ Ouellette, Laurie (2017). Keywords for Media Studies. New York University Press. ISBN 9781479859610.
  5. ^ search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,cpid&custid=ssc&db=edswao&AN=edswao.389869066&site=eds-live&scope=site.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

review on edit

[edit]

The edits were clear and helped organize the article a little better. The information given was necessary to help improve the article. It provides better examples of the topic than originally added. The words and phrases are neutral in the sense that they don't really state a personal opinion. It states facts. Overall, the sources were reliable and come from websites that give out accurate information and facts about the article topic. The contribution is helpful and helps make the article more informative and clear.

Nfreddo (talk) 19:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EvaluationS0376334 (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

[edit]

Looking at citations: 1.Citation six is a university official website used for teachers to create contents but there is no source of the author. What’s more, the information in the website only uses the source of another entry in Wikipedia without fact-checking. 2.Citation eight uses unnamed sources of information, such as "some scholars”, which is not credible. 3.Citation nine has only two Korean names without articles and links. 4.Citation 18 seems to no longer exist as when I type them into a search engine the results are missing.

Looking at the neutrality of the article: 1.Wikipedia recommends that each section of an article should be of same importance. With this being the case, sections that only contain two or three sentences should have more information to help the readers get a full understanding of media regulation across the globe. The second and third section of its history and the information about collective intelligence is too short to be neutral.

The biggest challenge of convergence culture

[edit]

The biggest challenge which is faced by the media industry is how to deal with the digital communication and information technologies.[1] With the rapid development of convergence culture, it has brought much concerns to the relevant reporters, because convergence frightens many people that they are confused whether their current skills are needed in the future. It’s common for them to fear and have resistance to change.[2] Meanwhile, in this converged environment, the competition between different media becomes fiercer.[3] The news media has adopted a 24-hour news cycle over time to provide a constant flood of information. Reporters are expected to process more stories and add more work to keep up with the industry demand which are overloaded without appropriate financial compensation.[4]

Indrati I(20 June 2018). “Challenges to Mass Media Posed by Convergence in the Indonesian Context”. Retrieved from: https://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/challenges-to-mass-media-posed-by-convergence-in-the-indonesian-context.pdf Edgar Huang (1 February 2006). “Facing the Challenges of Convergence: Media Professionals’ Concerns of Working Across Media Platforms.” Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856506061557 Forrest Carr(14 November 2020). “The truth about convergence.” Retrieved from: https://www.poynter.org/archive/2002/the-truth-about-convergence/ Serajul I. Bhuiyan (December 2010). “Teaching media convergence and its challenges.” Retrieved from: https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1318&context=apmeS0376334 (talk) 01:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, I am your peer-reviewer! I think this paragraph has a lot of insightful information.
    • You should reword the first sentence, because saying that it's the "biggest" challenge is more of an opinionated statement.
    • "brought much concerns" does not make sense grammatically. Either "brought much concern" or take that middle bit out and combine the other half of the sentence.
    • When you say "it's common for them", who is them? The relevant reporters? It doesn't connect well. Also, what are relevant reporters?
    • The last two sentences are very well written. If you wanted change, you could write a whole paragraph about how news outlets try to provide countless news so they end up producing a plethora of stories, which is not always good.
    • The information is enlightening and your sources are very credible!
    • I would reread your paragraph, honestly just the first three sentences, and try to make it more boring. It reads more of a paragraph from a well written essay. Spend more time informing rather than telling a story. Otherwise, I think you're set!

Jvanella23 (talk) 21:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]