Jump to content

Talk:Danganronpa 3: The End of Hope's Peak High School/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 09:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

[edit]
  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -
[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]
Giving another anime.
The reviewer and Kodaka himself calls it mystery. The Future arc does feel like proper sequel based on the killing game mystery as suggested by the reviewer. Kodaka called it a mystery anime not only because of how he conceived two parallel stories that are completely connected. Same with one of the actors, Morikawa, who claims Kyosuke Munakata can only be understood when watching both arcs.
Done
Done
Done.
Done
Deleted.
  • The Hope Arc finale earned positive responses for properly closing - this feels a bit definitive to be said in wikipedia's voice. We could omit "properly", unless we have a suitable direct quote Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.

General

[edit]
Done
Revised
Done
  • Danganronpa development staff said that while it was difficult to work on both titles simultaneously - I think it is worth stating that the development of this anime happened between DR2 and the third game before this, or it reads a bit confusing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Added tidbit.
Revised
Done
  • He said some fans called the idea of a happy ending pandering, but Kodaka said he wanted to give the cast this type of ending because of the games' contrasting conclusions - not sure why Kodaka's name is randomly in the middle of this sentence, as he said both things here. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Revised
Revised
Done.
Done.
Done with the reviewers who made reviews in regards to the anime itself. Other reviews are focused on single episodes since it was watched in this format back in 2016 based on its popularity.
The thing with Amazon is that Funimation's official website is locked to other regions. All other regions including Japanese release are linked to the primary accessible sources.
Added extra scores if that's what you claimed about reviewers btw.Tintor2 (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

[edit]

@Lee Vilenski: Thanks for reviewing it.Tintor2 (talk) 12:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: Gave the article a big revision because of your comments. However, I can't remove the amazon DVD links due to Funimation blocking their site to other regions, making it less accessible.Tintor2 (talk) 20:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: @Link20XX: You see, the home media release of Funimation can be found here and here. However, since I'm not an American, I don't have access to this site. I don't what source is better to use so in case be bold. Thanks Link20XX for coming.Tintor2 (talk) 22:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Either should be fine. The second link you sent is the original release, and the first is their essentials re-release, which basically is how they re-release older titles for less money. The original set is now out of print but the re-release is still purchasable. Link20XX (talk) 23:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: Then I guess both are worthmentioning if you could add them.Tintor2 (talk) 23:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Done. I also added some additional information. Link20XX (talk) 23:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, I believe my involvement here is done so have a great day and best of luck towards getting this article to GA. Link20XX (talk) 23:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: Link20XX replaced the Amazon links with primary sources (Funimation). Funimation and Amazon also mentioned that the anime also belongs to the horror genre so I added it alongside the source. Is there another issue you think should be fixed?Tintor2 (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I much prefer the primary source to amazon, as they get their release date/metadata from places and it isn't very reliable. Happy to pass. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]