Talk:Danger Days: The True Lives of the Fabulous Killjoys

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Post-hardcore: My Chemical Romance Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the My Chemical Romance task force.

Archives

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

One million copies since February 2011[edit]

I find it hard to believe that in just three months of release the album sold over a million copies. Is there a source on this? 176.24.90.124 (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genre, once again[edit]

@Friginator: These sources are indeed reliable, and now that the citations have quotes from the articles, it proves them worthy of citation. Please leave them alone. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 16:57, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced original research[edit]

An entire section of the article is unsourced, and after applying {{Citation needed}} to only one of the claims within, Sekyaw has seen fit to remove the request for a reliable source twice, with summaries that indicate obvious original research. I am asking that the article's sourcing be fixed, the {{Citation needed}} replaced, the offending claim be fixed, or a very good explanation provided for exactly why the rules should be ignored in this case. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 18:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fred Gandt: I added a source to the album notes. As I said, Bryar is credited while Miceli and Crozier are the performers. No original research. Just a simple duplicating of a source that was already in the article. Sekyaw (talk) 05:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reusing citations is normal practice on Wikipedia, so that's that. However, I have checked, checked and checked again and cannot find Bryar credited for drums anywhere on the sleeve or booklet of CD release 9362-49718-9 and doubt there's any significant difference between this version of the accreditation and that for the cited release 9362-49618-3. I am tagging the claim as {{dubious}} with a link to this discussion. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 18:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2020[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I wish to edit this article to add information to the story behind the album. DrDeathDefying2019 (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes DrDeathDefying2019 (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. If you have information you would like to add, please request it on this talk page and another editor may be willing to add the changes for you. Pupsterlove02 talk • contribs 18:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]