Talk:Daniel Parker (Baptist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Parker (Baptist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in “Religious Leadership” section[edit]

Under the section “Religious Leadership” I believe at least two places need attention and correction.

“Parker believed that the non-white races who were the targets of foreign missions were people who were descended from the wicked seed of the serpent. He stated that since ‘God would save His own children, and since the children of Satan were predestined to eternal punishment, any kind of mission plan would seem ridiculous.’”

1. “Parker believed that the non-white races who were the targets of foreign missions were people who were descended from the wicked seed of the serpent.” This claim is unsourced. Though it may appear that the footnote refers to Max Lee’s thesis “Daniel Parker’s Doctrine of the Two Seeds,” I found no such claim in Lee’s work. Nevertheless, the practice of Parker’s Pilgrim Predestinarian Church denies that Parker or his church believed such an idea. The early minutes of the church, during Parker’s lifetime, are still accessible. The church as a matter of practice received black members. For example, “On Sunday, 23d [August 1840], Received a Black woman by the name of Hannah by Experience, and Baptised her.”

2. “He stated that since ‘God would save His own children, and since the children of Satan were predestined to eternal punishment, any kind of mission plan would seem ridiculous.’”

This quote is in error. “God would save His own children, and since the children of Satan were predestined to eternal punishment, any kind of mission plan would seem ridiculous” is a quote from Max Lee’s thesis (p. 13), but it is not a quote of a statement by Parker. This is a statement of what some people said about Parker – “it would seem according to the traditional understanding of Parkers two-seed views that no mission plan whatsoever was needed.”

It is true and correct that Daniel Parker opposed the missionary system devised by the Baptist Board of foreign missions, but he did not oppose the preaching of the gospel. In fact, if one reads the entire thesis without cherry picking, we find that Max Lee concludes that Parker’s views have been misunderstood (for several reasons, some of which were Parkers own fault). On page 85 Lee writes, “Lest these non-elect have an excuse for their unbelief, Parker urged that the gospel be preached to men everywhere, including the non-elect.”

For now, I am placing this here as a recommendation for other editors to look at and perhaps devise a solution. Rlvaughn (talk) 16:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]