Talk:David Lewis (philosopher)

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Language / Analytic / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of language
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Photo

What a disappointment. Seriously. I LOVED the other picture of David Lewis, he had a great beard a smile in his eyes and (it appears) relaxing in his backyard. Now we have this Black and White picture of what? A high school year book photo? Cmon. I was so inspired by the previous picture for years and always imagined myself growing old doing philosophy in my backyard just like I imagined David doing in his backyard (sans beard). It reflects the joy of his character so much better than the new one. I mean the man's pen name comes from his cat. He deserves and equally tender and spirited photo to be remembered by. Non-pegasus (talk) 02:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aza24 I can't compare revisions on my phone. You reverted an edit in April due to a copyroght issue, were we removing the photo that had been here for years or a different one, if you can remember? Non-pegasus (talk) 02:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Non-pegasus, the image you are probably talking about was deleted at the commons, because there was no evidence it was in public domain (removed off this page by a different editor, see [1]). The image I removed had only been on the page for a few weeks, and it was deleted because it was simply pulled right from Britannica, also without a valid licensing tag.

Of course, we could re-upload either via our historical image tag (see the tag at File:Anthony Payne bust length.png, for example), but since a free one exists (the page's current image), that makes said rationale much weaker, and probably inadmissible. Aza24 (talk) 11:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aza24 Thank you for your explanation, I understand but that's too bad. Non-pegasus (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Non-pegasus, I much agree that the former image (the one with the hat, I presume?) was much better and more characteristic. Let me mull over this, we could argue that the current one doesn't represent him at all—as a college student yearbook picture—so a copyrighted version would be vastly more ideal. Aza24 (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]