Talk:Development theory

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International development High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

I broke the redirect from Development Theory to Modernization Theory on the grounds that within the field of development, Modernization theory is (a) far from the only theory of development, and (b) also a dated theory no longer advocated by development academics and development institutions. --Paperflowergirl 20:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i've never heard of State Theory. is it that new? can we have some authors'/writers' names at least? Alveolate 16:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Development theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120324024418/http://www.econ.utah.edu:80/~vernengo/papers/princeton.pdf to http://www.econ.utah.edu/~vernengo/papers/princeton.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:38, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dependency Theory

In this section there is a part that says, "Dependency theory states that poor nations provide natural resources and cheap labor for developed nations, without which the developed nations could not have the standard of living which they enjoy." Since it uses "states" is there a reference to it or where exactly is this idea from?

There was another section that mainly has to do with word choice/grammar "Primitive states have unique features, structures and institutions of their own and are the weaker with regard to the world market economy, while the developed nations have never been in this follower position in the past."

"Primitive" tends to have a negative connotation so I would suggest sticking with underdeveloped, undeveloped, or periphery states. And the "the weaker" part sounds a bit off, be bit more clear; they are the weaker what exactly? The word "follower" does not sit well in the sentence either maybe "have never been colonized" could be used instead.

Other than that good amount of info!

Alna21 (talk) 06:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]