Talk:Dplus KIA

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Video games: Esports Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the esports task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (3 participants)
Joshua Tomar (4 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (nom)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Kenshi (Mortal Kombat) (nom)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

WP:G11[edit]

I'm not seeing it. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: The deletion tag was added manually by a user without new page reviewer permissions. It's clear to me that the edit was done in bad faith, as were the additions by the user to my talk page. CentreLeftRight ✉ 17:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, @Kingoflettuce: It did look retaliatory to me. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, I looked at it and I'm formally declining the WP:CSD. FWIW, this page and User:Deepfriedokra/promo have what amounts to my criteria for deleting under WP:G11. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my apologies,, I mistakenly thought anything that very vaguely looked promotional, even if it clearly doesn't contain flowery language from the user himself and the user clearly isn't related to DAMWON Gaming, could be deleted under G11... My bad! Kingoflettuce (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingoflettuce: You don't have new page reviewer permissions to begin with. You're fooling nobody by going out of your way to look for an article I made and approved four days ago and adding a deletion notice manually, as well as an improper message on my talk page. Your article was tagged by me in good faith; there are rules on Wikipedia and the content created has to follow them. What you should have done immediately was contest the deletion and defend your position, not retaliate by tagging an article with four sentences for promotional violations, then leaving comments on my talk page. I absolutely despise disingenuous behaviour like this, and would rather have another well-meaning newcomer break all the rules than a malicious one following them. CentreLeftRight ✉ 04:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uh huh. Please quote the "improper" part(s) of what I posted on your talk page, dude. ("Dude", incidentally, was the sole word I "manually" posted on your talk page.) The tags and all were automatically generated by Twinkle. I didn't know only new page reviewers were entitled to flag pages for deletion. As for "well-meaning", I had nothing but good intentions in creating the article for Scott's BBQ. Can't say I don't despise the scurrilous G11/"blatant advertising" tag for that! You stick to your stuff and I'll stick to mine Kingoflettuce (talk) 05:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]