Talk:Electronic harassment
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electronic harassment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Electronic harassment is considered a delusion by many medical professionals, however there are patents at the U.S. Patent Office owned by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Intelligence Community proving that the technology to electronically harass people does exist. [1] [2] There are also historical events, such as the Moscow Signal incident, suggesting that electronic harassment may have been used by the United States and Soviet Union, against each other, during the Cold War. Bobduder (talk) 00:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- These patents are not evidence that the government is secretly microwaving the brains of random citizens. We will not interpret primary sources (such as patents) to undercut reliable secondary sources, or to prop up delusions or conspiracy theories, that goes against just about every content policy we have. - MrOllie (talk) 00:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Not done. The request must be of the form "please change X to Y", and must be supported by references to reliable sources. Cullen328 (talk) 00:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- The U.S. patent office isn't a reliable source? One of them is a patent owned by the U.S. Air Force. Bobduder (talk) 00:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- The U.S. patent office contains patents for many devices which do not exist (and indeed are impossible) such as perpetual motion machines [1]. MrOllie (talk) 00:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- The U.S. patent office isn't a reliable source? One of them is a patent owned by the U.S. Air Force. Bobduder (talk) 00:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't say that it proves that the government is secretly microwaving people's brains, I said there is proof that the technologies to do it to people exist and that there are historical events, like the moscow signal, or havanna syndrome suggesting that it is possible. By the way, the U.S. Academy of Sciences stated that microwave weapons could be behind havanna syndrome.
- https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/02/politics/havana-syndrome-report/index.html Bobduder (talk) 00:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Then this request is at best irrelevant, because /this/ article is about symptoms of delusion, not real events. MrOllie (talk) 00:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- I cited two real events and technologies suggesting that it could be a real thing. The wikipedia article states at the very beginning that it's a "conspiracy theory" and says that "medical professionals consider it a delusion". Why can't we include information supporting the conspiracy theory? Bobduder (talk) 00:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- For the same reason Globe doesn't suggest the earth might be flat. MrOllie (talk) 00:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that the earth is flat. There is evidence for V2K RNM DEW abuse worldwide. 2603:9001:2E02:EBC0:A888:226E:F873:4C61 (talk) 02:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- When you get the NY times to write about it, so will we. Should be a big news story. Wikipedia will continue to follow the mainstream on this, as this encyclopedia is designed to do. MrOllie (talk) 02:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- The mainstream has reported several times on DEW abuse. Here's one from NBC with proof it is not psychosomatic, and that according to the National Academy of Sciences Havana Syndrome was most likely a "pulsed microwave energy attack". Adding evidence that this isn't psychosomatic only adds to the breadth of the article.
- https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-tmFJDpLuMI&pp=ygUWVjJrIHJubSBuZXcgeW9yayB0aW1lcw%3D%3D 2603:9001:2E02:EBC0:FA2B:59BA:D307:4CA (talk) 04:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- just to note [not the New York Times, but ..]: The Washington Post, in a Sunday Magazine cover story article on January 14, 2007, wrote about victims. That article, “Mind Games”, by journalist Sharon Weinberger, appears at [text only]:
- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399_pf.html ;
- [ The article's 'subtitle text' was: "New on the Internet: a community of people who believe the government is beaming voices into their minds. They may be crazy, but the Pentagon has pursued a weapon that can do just that." ] HRtsFan (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not to mention that electronic harrassment isn't limited to conspiracy theories and that ganstalkers often use forms of electronic harassment. 2603:9001:2E02:EBC0:FA2B:59BA:D307:4CA (talk) 10:50, 26 September 2023 (UT
- When you get the NY times to write about it, so will we. Should be a big news story. Wikipedia will continue to follow the mainstream on this, as this encyclopedia is designed to do. MrOllie (talk) 02:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that the earth is flat. There is evidence for V2K RNM DEW abuse worldwide. 2603:9001:2E02:EBC0:A888:226E:F873:4C61 (talk) 02:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- For the same reason Globe doesn't suggest the earth might be flat. MrOllie (talk) 00:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- I cited two real events and technologies suggesting that it could be a real thing. The wikipedia article states at the very beginning that it's a "conspiracy theory" and says that "medical professionals consider it a delusion". Why can't we include information supporting the conspiracy theory? Bobduder (talk) 00:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Then this request is at best irrelevant, because /this/ article is about symptoms of delusion, not real events. MrOllie (talk) 00:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Not done. The request must be of the form "please change X to Y", and must be supported by references to reliable sources. Cullen328 (talk) 00:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Besides WP:FRINGE, the problem is WP:SYNTH. You want to connect Electronic harassment is considered a delusion by many medical professionals
with however there are patents at the U.S. Patent Office owned by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Intelligence Community
when no reliable WP:FRIND source has indicated these two things are connected and need to be taken into consideration. And adding ...proving that the technology to electronically harass people does exist
is again, not supported by any reliable source, and dubious since patent filings don't indicate that a technology will work or does exist. There are also historical events, such as the Moscow Signal incident, suggesting that electronic harassment may have been used by the United States and Soviet Union...
Again, this article is about the delusion that ordinary citizens are being targeted by mind control technology. No reliable source exists that connects Moscow Signal (or Havana syndrome) to this delusion or suggests that it may not be a delusion because these incidents occurred. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- In addition the the National Academy of Sciences finding above that Havana Syndrome was most likely a pulsed energy weapon attack. I looked up directed energy weapons and law enforcement. Found a mobile version of a DEW called Silent Guardian which is marketed to civilian law enforcement and other security agencies since 2011. It actually states that it is at risk for inappropriate use because of the range. Ref: American Civil Liberties Union.
- Regardless of who is at fault both of these sources exhibit evidence that electronic harrasment may not be psychosomatic. 2607:FB91:1842:D524:AC39:8277:99F0:83C9 (talk) 15:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- These sources are being interpreted by you as evidence that claims of covert electronic harassment of ordinary citizens may not be persecutory delusions. Because my neighbor owns lawn care chemicals that are poisonous when ingested does not mean he is secretly poisoning me. - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- So you didn't research the National Academy of Sciences finding that the victims of Havana Syndrome experienced real physical phenomenon not delusions. 2603:9001:2E02:EBC0:892B:9FE2:6A51:430B (talk) 00:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's irrelevant to this article, which is about people with delusions of persecution. MrOllie (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- So you didn't research the National Academy of Sciences finding that the victims of Havana Syndrome experienced real physical phenomenon not delusions. 2603:9001:2E02:EBC0:892B:9FE2:6A51:430B (talk) 00:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- These sources are being interpreted by you as evidence that claims of covert electronic harassment of ordinary citizens may not be persecutory delusions. Because my neighbor owns lawn care chemicals that are poisonous when ingested does not mean he is secretly poisoning me. - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
References
Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2023[edit]
This article, like all others on Wikipedia, is based on what published reliable sources have to say on the relevant subject matter itself. We do not engage in original research. This talk page is not a forum for speculation. Since no specific edit, citing appropriate sources directly supporting any such edit, has been proposed, this topic is closed. | ||
---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||
Withholding (25 year delay) of U.S. President-ordered reform supports allegations of U.S. victims-community and Public Suspicions On March 27, 1997, President Bill Clinton ordered all? federal agencies then known to do human research to jointly propose, and to attempt to adopt, changes to the governmentwide common federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects [the June 1991 'Common Rule'], which would require informed consent for all classified human research. This ordered policy revision for classified human experimentation would: prohibit waiver of informed consent; require researchers to disclose to subjects that the project is classified; require permanent recordkeeping, and, for all studies except minimal risk human research, to require that researchers inform human subjects of the sponsoring agency. In doing so, President Clinton sought to implement a recommendation from the October 1995 Final Report of the federal Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments ['ACHRE'], its Recommendation 15, which recommended "the adoption of a federal policy requiring the informed consent of all human subjects of classified research and that this requirement not be subject to exemption or waiver". Originally, President Clinton's order had stated that "Agencies shall, within 1 year, after considering any comments, promulgate final rules on the protection of human subjects of classified research." [1] However, as of the end of the Clinton Administration in January 2001, a draft notice for the policy change had not been approved by a few of the many agencies involved, and as of October 2023, this policy change has neither been jointly proposed to the Public, nor jointly adopted by the agencies. In June 2015, the U.S. Department of Energy ['DOE'] made a legal finding that the 'Clinton Memo' mandate "is still in effect and applicable to DOE". Subsequently, in January 2016, DOE adopted the basic Clinton Memo requirements as part of its internal policies. [2] In November 2011, the U.S. Department of Defense ['DOD'] changed its internal policies to clearly include requirements of the Clinton Memo, but subsequent revisions to the DOD internal policy since April 2020 have fallen away from clearly stating those requirements, notably abandoning the unambiguous November 2011 statement that "Waivers of informed consent are prohibited." Therefore, the U.S. community of alleged victims of so called "electronic harassment" - but which in reality essentially alleges non-consensual human testing, or other activities, involving advanced technology electromagnetic-signals monitoring and harassment of the human body and brain, typically day and night, most plausibly by the U.S. Government - has reason to worry about the likely involvement of the U.S. Government, because of the U.S. Government's refusal to adopt changes to the governmentwide federal Policy which would clearly prohibit non-consensual classified human experimentation. This non-adoption should cause the Public to be suspicious as well. At the least, (as of October 2023) the U.S. Government appears to not be dedicated to safeguarding the basic U.S. constitutional rights of its citizens from non-consensual classified human testing programs. The requirement for informed consent for all human experimentation is part of the Nuremberg Code, is part of the I.C.C.P.R. human rights treaty (at ICCPR article 7), and is considered as a requirement by the [U.S.] Belmont Report - which remains a Congressionally mandated statement of the basic ethical principles under which federal sponsored human research shall be conducted. [3] HRtsFan (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC) References
Not done An anonymous essay claiming that certain language contained in legislature indicates the US government secretly intends non-consensual testing on humans. No, Wikipedia doesn't indulge evidence-free speculation. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC) |
Unprofessional Article[edit]
This article is unprofessional. It links everything with everything. It combines the belief of TI and realistic programs of the US government like MK-ULTRA with delusional. These are completely different subjects. Brain targeted weapons exist. They are real and demonstrated. The governments that experimented with brain control exist.
And why so biast in the so called 'medical professionals' that do the claim about hallucinations or psychosis in the wiki? (1)Article from 2007 is no evidence for the claim. Read it. Not medical. It is just a story. (2)Article from 2012. Author? Angela Monroe from Kmir news? is she medical professional ? No is not. It is illustrative. (5) General book about disorders. (6) A doctor talks about 'groupthink' and a patient that is already 20 years schizophrenic. No realistic evidence for the claim.
This is Wikipedia and we need to inform correctly. It is time to write a new wiki about AI and radio technology that is capable and useable of mind control.
"At various times and places throughout history, gouvernments have indeed attempted to develop mind-contol capabilities-and some of those efforts have continued to this day. ... For most of the topics I've covered thus far, there have been shades of gray; our cognitive liberties are not always absolute. But when it comes to the weaponization of mind control, virtually every example is clearly over the line."
Book: 'The Battle for your Brain' Nita A. Faharany - board member Presidential Commission Bioethical Issues 145.87.253.240 (talk) 22:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you going to make a specific request? Like "change X to Y", or "remove X", and so on. I don't see anything above but venting and vague handwaving complaints. You mention sources but nothing specific enough to be actionable. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely I do. I want the wiki presenting truth and reality. I want the specific phrase to be removed. Not only because it is very outdated, the links in the discussed phrase are -as I demonstrated-, not correct. The claim 'medical professionals' is false. So I ask to update the wiki. I have more and there is more reliable research that is up to date on this subject. The source I presented is very recent, and as member of the presidential ethical commission: truthful and valuable. 145.87.253.240 (talk) 11:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- So I want this section and the links removed. And add the tekst I mentioned with link to the book.
- 'Multiple medical professionals have concluded that these experiences are hallucinations, the result of delusional disorders, or psychosis.' 145.87.253.240 (talk) 11:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely I do. I want the wiki presenting truth and reality. I want the specific phrase to be removed. Not only because it is very outdated, the links in the discussed phrase are -as I demonstrated-, not correct. The claim 'medical professionals' is false. So I ask to update the wiki. I have more and there is more reliable research that is up to date on this subject. The source I presented is very recent, and as member of the presidential ethical commission: truthful and valuable. 145.87.253.240 (talk) 11:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- Start-Class psychiatry articles
- Unknown-importance psychiatry articles
- Psychiatry task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Start-Class Alternative Views articles
- Low-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles