Talk:Emil Krebs

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To Cleaner-Uppers[edit]

This article appears to have been computer-translated from the same article at German Wikipedia.[1 ] I can read bits of German so I'm trying to fix the dreadful prose that has resulted. Of course, these things take longer than you think. Schmitty120 22:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

I added an unreferenced flag. There are actually a few references (or at least external links), but they do not cover the full article, and they are not reliable or verifiable. Any source that claims to know for sure that he knew 68 languages, and that he mastered them all to perfection, is likely out of touch with reality. The external link from Weikopf makes this claim, at the same time as it gives a statement from himself at the age of 47 when he claims to be able to translate correctly into only seven foreign languages. The number 68 then implies that he learnt writing in 61 languages during the last sixteen years of his life, and that he kept all of them alive. I am willing to believe that only when I see what he has written. Mlewan (talk) 09:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Small Article for a Prolific Polyglot[edit]

I cannot believe that such a prolific polyglot genius would have such a small article with so little information contained in its text!!! Terranovia360 (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He never sopke all those languages.[edit]

With these prolific polyglots it is always the same: they are like saints, that is, they all lived in the past and now we cannot really check it. Nowadays, at present, when this type of knowledge can be checked, we find no one who comes even come close speaking languages correctly, not just a few sentences! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.203.72 (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]