Jump to content

Talk:Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Diannaa (talk · contribs) 00:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cirt. I will start the review tomorrow. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks very much, and feel free to take your time! :) — Cirt (talk) 03:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
    • I have done a wee copy edit; the prose is fine.
    B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    • Sabalos is used as a source, and should therefore not be listed in Further Reading (I have fixed this).
  2. Sourcing:
    A. Provides references, with in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    • Article is sourced to high quality newspapers and periodicals. None of the sources are available online, so I was unable to check for copyright issues.
    B. No original research:
    • Opinions expressed are those of the sources
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Main aspects are addressed:
    • Article covers the topics listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Books, including Background, Content summary, Publication history, Reception. Article is a bit short for a GA but covers all the main points.
    • Star-Reporter of what city? I assumed Columbia, South Carolina; please fix this if it's wrong.
    B. Remains focused:
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    • Info box image is properly licensed and scaled to the correct size for non-free use.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Just a couple of minor points, which I have already fixed. Article passes to GA. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]