Talk:Ernst Klink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources[edit]

K.e.coffman (talk) 17:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ernst Klink/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Catrìona (talk · contribs) 08:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Comments to follow. Catrìona (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in very good shape.

  • I would recommend tweaking the lede to make it more clear what HIAG was, and how his affiliation with that organization affects evaluation of his scholarship.
Expanded on his work in the lead. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{sfn|MüllerUeberschär|2002|p=85}} Is this a valid citation style, or do you mean {{sfn|Müller|Ueberschär|2002|p=85}}?
Fixed. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed