Jump to content

Talk:Ethics (Abelard)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 21:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ethics (Abelard); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Interesting article, new enough, long enough, well-cited, and the hook fact is directly cited. QPQ done. I was able to read the closed-access journal article for the sentence corresponding to the hook fact, and it checks out. I also could not detect any close paraphrasing from said journal article. As the rest of the works cited are offline and/or out of my purview, however, I will assume good faith that they've been sufficiently paraphrased. DigitalIceAge (talk) 09:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]