Talk:Eustreptospondylus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eustreptospondylus/Streptospondylus cuvieri tussle[edit]

Walker (1964) noted that Streptospondylus cuvieri was too ill-preserved to be defined as valid, and demonstrated that one specimen originally assigned to S. cuvieri, and then to Megalosaurus, wasdiagnostic enough to be a new genus and species of dinosaur, which he named Eustreptospondylus oxoniensis. Streptospondylus cuvieri is therefore not synonymous with E. oxoniensis. Therefore, update the Eustreptospondylus page.

Walker (1964). "Triassic reptiles from the Elgin area: Ornithosuchus and the origin of carnosaurs". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 248: 53-134. - Vahe Demirjian

Streptospondylus cuvieri[edit]

Streptospondylus cuvieri is from the early Bathonian Chipping Norton Formation (Owen 1842), whereas Eustreptospondylus comes from the late Callovian Middle Oxford Clay (Martill 1988), so it's unlikely S. cuvieri is the same as Eustreptospondylus.

Owen R (1842). "Report on British fossil reptiles". Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 11: 60–204.

D. M. Martill. 1988. A review of the terrestrial vertebrate of fossils of the Oxford Clay (Callovian-Oxfordian) of England. Mercian Geologist 11(3):171-190.68.4.61.168 (talk) 16:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Another species?[edit]

I have a personal record of another species, E. divensis. Can anyone else verify this?Ninjatacoshell 20:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E. divesensis is the same as Piveteausaurus divesensis. ArthurWeasley 20:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eustreptospondylus.jpg[edit]

Image:Eustreptospondylus.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Name Translation[edit]

There's no such translation as "true Streptospondylus". Its name means "well curved vertebrae". It's meant to be in reference to the additions on the animal's spine. --12.17.177.164 (talk) 02:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]