Talk:ExploreLearning

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 May 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Contesting speedy deletion[edit]

I did not think that a company stub would be instantly nominated for speedy deletion. Isn't the point of a stub that it is given a chance to grow? In any event, the notability of this company is that it apparently provides the world's largest collection of online educational simulations for math and science, as is noted in the original stub.

Further, the company has received numerous significant awards in education and has been adopted in many school districts and in some cases in entire US states. This is amply documented not just in company press releases but also in external sources, but I did not see a way to add that information in a concise way, so decided to just add a stub and get to that later. As an example, the company was nominated for six Finalist awards from the Association of Educational Publishers, as can be seen from the links off this page. However, providing that link doesn't seem to be a very good provision of reference, so I was going to eventually get around to digging up something else which says it all on one page. There is of course a cite from the company blog, but that of course is not the best source for such information.

For comparison, see the article on BrainPOP, which is a single tool analogous to the tools provided by this company. That article has clearly developed nicely, and given the analog, I do not see why this article would not develop in a similar way. — Epastore (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have added numerous references, which were easily located in Google Scholar. There are plenty more there. — Epastore (talk) 19:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ExploreLearning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100918215818/http://cambiumlearning.com/about/company.shtml to http://www.cambiumlearning.com/about/company.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]